User talk:HaEr48/Archives/2017/April

Plered
When I created the stub I never imagined it could have got to what it has now..

And to have had to DYK's as well - thank you so much for what you have done to the subject, and may you continue - your contributions to Javanese history and geography are just brilliant! shukran/terima kasih !! JarrahTree 23:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Glad you like it - I hope to keep working on Javanese and Indonesian topics here! HaEr48 (talk) 01:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The level of what I might call professionalism (maybe not the right word) on the articles gives a standard which a significant amount of Indonesian articles lack, horribly... If only we had your dedication and exactitude (not the right word) in quadruplicate - the Indonesian project would be at such a better standard!  JarrahTree 01:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Sasak language copyedit

 * Thanks for copyediting this! I edited the article in response to your comments and clarify tags, does the edit make sense? I'm happy to clarify further. HaEr48 (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks good; language articles tend to be jargon-heavy, although I enjoy copyediting them. All the best,  Mini  apolis  13:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Surabaya (1677)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Surabaya (1677) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pangeran Pekik
Hello! Your submission of Pangeran Pekik at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK promotions
Hi, thanks for helping out at DYK by promoting hooks to the prep areas. I just wanted to let you know that when you promoted Yuri on Ice it looks like you forgot to close the nomination template (I've now closed it so it doesn't get promoted a second time by anyone else). I had a quick look and I think you closed all of the other nominations, so this one probably just slipped your mind – no big deal, but maybe it's worth double-checking this step in the future. Thanks! 97198 (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * thank you for taking care of it and for notifying me. I double-checked the rest and they all are closed now. Sorry about that - it was my first time doing promotions and either slipped my mind or I forgot to click save on one of the multiple tabs I opened for that purpose. HaEr48 (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to thank you for helping out with prep building. Please note that your Prep 5 had 1 bio and 7 non-bio articles. I added in a few more bios for balance. Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Proof of the Truthful
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Proof of the Truthful you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 20:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Prep 1
I was about to complete Prep 1 and in readiness, I put an "inuse" tag on it. Then I realised you were in the process of filling it, so I stopped. I'll leave you to remove the tag. I apologise for intruding! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I normally put the "inuse" tag on a prep set before I start adding hooks because I tend to fill the whole set before I save it. Anyway, I managed to retrieve the four hooks with which I had theoretically completed Prep 2 before we had an edit conflict, and I moved them to Prep 4.
 * So, how to avoid edit conflicts in future? This is the time of day when I am in the habit of promoting hooks. The "inuse" tag is not entirely effective because one's computer caches the previous version of the page and it may not therefore be visible to somebody else. However, it is notable in the page's history, and you could always check there before adding a hook to a different set. Anyway, please do not let this put you off filling sets. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, I was surprised to see the inuse after I saved the page. I guess cache explained why I didn't see it before. Sorry about causing edit conflict and I'll try to be more careful next time. Should I move the one hook I put there in a different prep area? HaEr48 (talk) 06:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * That hook is fine where it is, and you can complete the set if you want. I have moved on to Prep 4 now. :) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Footsteps (novel)
Hello! Your submission of Footsteps (novel) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Year of Sorrow
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Proof of the Truthful
The article Proof of the Truthful you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Proof of the Truthful for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Surabaya (1677)
The article Battle of Surabaya (1677) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Surabaya (1677) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Gegodog
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Karaeng Galesong
Mifter (talk) 01:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Surabaya (1677)
The article Battle of Surabaya (1677) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Surabaya (1677) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)