User talk:Haack123

Image tagging for File:Joseph, Octave and George on Hannibal.png
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph, Octave and George on Hannibal.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

The image came from a book, how would I add that information? Haack123 (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

The copyright belongs to the University of Illinois Press, how do I put this information on the page? Haack123 (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

I put the information on the page. Is there anything else you would like me to do? Haack123 (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Reversing Falls Tomlinson Bridge.png
Thanks for uploading File:Reversing Falls Tomlinson Bridge.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

The image is from A family book. Please tell me how I set it to a family possession. Haack123 (talk) 05:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Ashtabula Accident Tomlinson.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ashtabula Accident Tomlinson.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 04:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Joseph Tomlinson (1816-1905).png
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Tomlinson (1816-1905).png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Joseph, Octave and George on Hannibal.png
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph, Octave and George on Hannibal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Joseph Tomlinson Hannibal Bridge (Chanute and Morison).png
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Tomlinson Hannibal Bridge (Chanute and Morison).png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Tomlinson Chest 85.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Tomlinson Chest 85.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Joseph Tomlinson Bridge Model.png
Thank you for uploading File:Joseph Tomlinson Bridge Model.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Tomlinson III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cedar River ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Joseph_Tomlinson_III check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Joseph_Tomlinson_III?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Tomlinson III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Tomlinson III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph Tomlinson III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castagna, Catanzaro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sila ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Castagna%2C_Catanzaro check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Castagna%2C_Catanzaro?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saratoga and Washington Railroad


The article Saratoga and Washington Railroad has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No context or meaningful information provided."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sounder Bruce  00:07, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced edits
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of William Rae Allan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Rae Allan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/William Rae Allan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

William Rae Allan was the son of a very notable shipping magnate. He was also a very successful investor himself and was the senior partner to my great great grandfather Robert McKay. It is absolutely unnecessary to delete his article and I am not even sure why the topic would arise. If you have any common sense at all, the article should not be deleted. Haack123 (talk) 23:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)