User talk:Habilemonkac

Nomination of Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 4ing (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Germanic, DRK and Riksarkivet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foreign volunteers for nursing for the German Red Cross during World War II


A tag has been placed on Foreign volunteers for nursing for the German Red Cross during World War II, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iselilja (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Pasting a copy of Foreign volunteers for nursing for Germany during World War II to User talk:Jimbo Wales is a bad thing. Don't do that again. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Habilemonkac_and_Foreign_volunteers_for_nursing_for_the_German_Red_Cross_during_World_War_II. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at User talk:Jimbo Wales shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz Read! Talk! 12:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

You can't delete WP:CSD tags from articles you created. Edit warring to do so is also not allowed. Stop. JoeSperrazza (talk) 12:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:CSD states The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it. JoeSperrazza (talk) 12:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Foreign volunteers for nursing for the German Red Cross during World War II.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  12:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * See Administrator intervention against vandalism. JoeSperrazza (talk) 13:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.

April 2015 (part II)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Sju hav. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)