User talk:Habitofarcane

I deleted it because it's not notable enough to have an own article in Wikipedia. If you Google it, you get 2 results (both are from this deleted Wikipedia page). Thank you for your appreciation! NCurse work 17:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review
Regarding your request at Deletion review/Content review to have the contents of Habit of Arcane relisted, I wanted to advise that the section of Deletion Review where you requested it has the specific function of supplying the material for creators, but not restoring it to article space. I have placed the text on your user page so that you might bring it in line with Wikipedia's guidelines before recreating the article. This particular article needs to conform to the music guidelines and the guidelines on biographies about living persons. It needs reliable, secondary sources independent of the individual's own publications to verify its claims. It must be written neutrally and without promotion. Since your username suggests you may have a conflict of interest in this case, you will need to be particularly careful to observe these policies if you choose to recreate the article. Because Wikipedia is not a blog, this material cannot remain indefinitely on your user page before these issues are addressed. If you do not log in often, there is a chance that it will be deleted before you are able to work on it. In that case, given your connection, it may be simpler for you just to rewrite it within guidelines rather than requesting that the original material, which does not conform to policy, be restored to you. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2007 (UTC)