User talk:Habst/Archive 1

Welcome!

 * }

Category redirects
The syntax to use is  , not the regular. Category:Red list works now; anything accidentally placed in it will be moved to the correct category automatically by a bot. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 09:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help. --Habstinat (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 10,000 metres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eugene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1993 National Games of China, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tips and Li Yi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
hi, thanks for the thanks, i like adding lots of projects to article talkpage so more editors are aware of the article.

Coolabahapple (talk) 08:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 

Invitations
Hmlarson (talk) 04:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

AWB granted
Howdy, I've granted you access to AWB. Please respect the AWB policies and let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, Nakon  02:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I'll be sure to do that. --Habst (talk) 03:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Karissa
I've been meaning to get around to creating a page for Allie for over a year, and hoped someone would do it, as I don't have a lot of time. When I started it, I was looking at various race results and found Karissa to be something of a nemesis, though she finished well in front of her at the XC nationals in 2017. I looked to see if Karissa had a page, so I could Wikilink her name in text. That's how I found your new page created for her. I actually used your medals template for Allie's page. That's a great picture of her, but I'm not sure there might not be an objection, depending whether or not it's in the public domain. Thanks to you I also looked at the list of American female steeplechase runners, expecting to find Jackson, Coburn and Simpson, and was surprised to see Shannon Rowbury. I didn't know she had ever run one. So I researched and found she had, in 2006, while at Duke, but couldn't find any date or location. She ran a 9:59.4. Activist (talk) 08:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the praise! Turns out there was an old page for Schweizer in 2016 but it unfortunately got deleted -- after recreating it from scratch I found a cached version of the 2016 article online and it looked fine, so it's a shame I didn't see it in time to contest that deletion. re: achievement table, I figured, the wording on the templates seemed very similar (which of course is fine!). The pictures I used on both articles are definitely freely licensed, they were a little tough to find because they're not tagged with names but if you click through you'll see that they were uploaded to Flickr as CC-BY licensed (by the parent of someone else who probably deserves their own article...) Going through their albums is a good source for collegiate photos as they upload all their photos as CC-BY and they have albums for a bunch of high-profile meets since 2013. I knew about Coburn and Simpson but Jackson was before my time -- so thanks for pointing me to that info! And I remember reading that tidbit about Rowbury, definitely interesting and a good reason for having the categories. Thanks for adding the details there to her article.


 * I might go through and create a bunch of NCAA articles in the coming weeks if I have time (and if I can find a better way to automate the table creation as a matrix-format like at Ewen, Rogers, etc.) I think there are a lot of athletes that meet NCOLLATH certainly deserving of an article that just don't have one yet. I also think there's a lot of creative ways we could go with it -- more meet articles (Payton Jordan, Stanford, etc. all don't have articles yet), more university-specific articles like Oregon Ducks track and field, finishing up the indoor records for List of United States collegiate records in track and field, more old NCAA champ articles (like for 2017), maybe some record progression / event-specific NCAA articles like "history of the steeplechase in collegiate athletics"... I might ping you back again if I can find the time for all that haha. But thanks again for the talk page message, I appreciate the ping! --Habst (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Habst, and welcome to WiR. It's good to have a new member capable of writing such informative articles on women athletes. I hope you will be inspired to write many more, whether or not we are specifically focusing on women in sports. If you run into any difficulties or need any assistance, please let me know or post a message on the WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

TFRRS
Thanks for establishing the TFRRS template. One problem which I will suggest you address in a revision, is that TFRRS produces multiple files for the same athlete. Here is Andre De Grasse at USC, but it ignores previous collegiate accomplishments at  Coffeyville Community College and they also produced a random post collegiate article  and a weird one for a 2013 indoor race. Its not you, me or wikipedia who is confused, its TFRRS. But how do we unify this chaos into something the wikipedia readers can understand? Trackinfo (talk) 06:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, that's a good point that I didn't originally consider when making the template.
 * The clearest way that I can think of to fix that would be to make the template accept multiple sets of numbered (id, label, xc) triples, so that it would be backwards compatible with old transclusions but also allow you to link a bunch of different TFRRS profiles to one athlete. So your Andre De Grasse example could become for example:
 * And then that would display as something like this:
 * Andre De Grasse at TFRRS: At the University of Southern California, At Coffeyville Community College, One random post-collegiate article, A weird 2013 indoor race
 * I've seen the "numbered" parameters done on other sets of templates before so I'm sure I could study those and implement that some time this week.
 * There are also two smaller concerns I've had with the template recently but I'm not sure if they are really worth fixing / if they are even problems. The first is that we might be "losing" the slug information in some of the URLs, i.e. when we transform https://www.tfrrs.org/athletes/6568861/Coffeyville_CC/Tyrone_Thornton.html to https://www.tfrrs.org/athletes/6568861 via the template then we're losing the words "Coffeyville_CC" and "Tyrone_Thornton" in the original wikitext, even though they are obvious when you click the URL I worry this might not be good in the long run, especially if URLs go dead. I might try to make those two "slug" fields optional in the template so you can preserve them if you want. Also a few days ago I also saw a new URL format someone linked that had something like a UUID (with hex / not only numeric values) in the TFRRS link, and I'm not sure if that new / other format would work with my template. I can't re-find that now (I see you've done a lot of work replacing all the TFRRS links on Wikipedia so thank you so much for that!) so I might just forget about that until it comes up again.
 * But thanks so much for your thoughts on this, and thanks for using my template! I think I'm going to move forward with this plan some time this week if I can find time for it and figure it out technically. It might also involve some changes on the Wikidata side of things too. --Habst (talk) 07:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Assuming we make this viable, which may take multiple attempts as happened with the IAAF template for example, there could be potentially thousands of TFRRS transclusions, not that I want to spend the time to edit them all in. I've already got plenty of potential projects that I keep avoiding for the obvious time involved. Trackinfo (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, I ended up getting my hands wet with Lua scripting for the first time today and I wrote Module:TFRRS, which is now being used in Template:TFRRS to make my example work and solve this problem. It should be fully backwards compatible with all the existing transclusions as well. For example see:
 * Hey, I ended up getting my hands wet with Lua scripting for the first time today and I wrote Module:TFRRS, which is now being used in Template:TFRRS to make my example work and solve this problem. It should be fully backwards compatible with all the existing transclusions as well. For example see:




 * I also added "teamslug" and "nameslug" parameters so you can preserve the original URL bits if you want as I mentioned above. If you think this is now OK to roll out further, what do you think the best way to go about doing that would be? --Habst (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks like a good improvement. I wouldn't use "weird" in this context in public view . . . Trackinfo (talk) 22:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thank you! Of course we wouldn't use that in an article, just using your words in your original post for demonstration . I updated the template doc with the basics but it could be improved a little more. Once we get it on a few more articles maybe I can try to see how best to integrate that info into Wikidata (in addition to the Tilastopaja and IAAF templates). Let me know if you have any more suggestions though, I think it would be fantastic if we could get this template better-adopted now! --Habst (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Habst, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AHabst added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you! I'll be sure to use it responsibly and let you know if I have any questions. --Habst (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

JWB collegiate track and field redirect job
I'm about to run a WP:JWB job that creates track-specific redirects to general collegiate sports teams like Akron Zips track and field to Akron Zips, only where no track-specific article already exists and there is at least some mention of the presence of a track team on the general article. This is already done on many pages so I'm just completing the job, but I'll link to this topic in edit summaries. The preliminary list is here, but I'm going to be doing sanity checks on every page as I'm doing it: User:Habst/JWB/College track articles to be created. --Habst (talk) 01:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you
So yes I want to personally thank you for your hard work with the NCAA results. It is great to have a new face here, I have felt so alone. There are so many more historical results to attend to. And your results, complete with prose, are much better than I have done and a model for future improvements. If you have any insights or techniques to reduce the labor in transcribing these results into wiki format, I am all ears. Trackinfo (talk) 00:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks so much for this! I hope to stay a while . As for the NCAA tables specifically, I wrote a little script to auto-generate them with colors and disambiguate the team names to their corresponding Wikipedia entries (e.g. Penn Penn Quakers track and field) at User:Habst/Scripts/makencaatable.py and User:Habst/Scripts/fullteams.txt (latter list was just generated from some PetScan I ran earlier). If you have Python and the required libraries (I just use BeautifulSoup and requests), then you can generate the table by running it like: python3 makencaatable.py https://www.ncaa.com/sites/default/files/external/track-field/results/d1/outdoor18/Finals/041_Scores.htm decathlon


 * Still planning on finishing up that main article with prose though, haha. I also wrote a little article-template generator on my site that fills out the medal table based on Tilastopja stats here, but I've stopped using that recently because I don't like the output that much. I think it's tempting to just get robots to write the whole encyclopedia but I also really do like the prose so I'm trying not to do too many auto-jobs without incorporating a lot of language / subjectivity, which I think is super important.


 * I'm a student of the sport but still pretty young, so if you have any suggestions for older articles / concepts that need some love I'll definitely try to take those on. In light of the new World Champs qualifying method for 2019, I've been working a lot more on results integration with Wikidata recently -- I recently got IAAF ID integrated into the widely-used Authority control which I think is a big deal, and I built a Wikidata bot (proposal here) that can begin to populate WD with athletics results. Ultimately, my long term goal is to have an infobox template you can just stick on every athlete article automatically populated from Wikidata, that will list all their results in a centralized way so every language editor can improve them -- I think this should already be possible technically but just needs to be implemented. There's of course a lot of ways we can go with it, too.


 * Also of course thank you for all the prior coverage -- I've used a lot of your articles and tables as templates for my work, and really enjoyed reading some of the more creative stuff like Oregon Sweep. I'll see you around! --Habst (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I too enjoy the prose, explaining the sport, the strategy behind a bunch of people just running fast etc etc. I've been adding prose to World Championship and Olympic articles as I find youtube videos to source from.


 * By the way, creative stuff is my company name. The Python coding is way over my head currently, though I would welcome an education.  But you'll have to start with the very basics . . . to turn it on, do this.  I'm old, next season will be my 50th year of officiating and I have been competing longer than that.  Still active even this month.  So I will have more of a historical perspective.  Feel free to bounce stuff off of me.


 * I have been trying to work my way backwards through history. I have a lot of old NCAA results and all USA National Championships downloaded and broken down into Excel.  Manually compiling that into wiki is time consuming and I haven't had much time lately.  Inevitably when I do a list article, I end up seeing a glaring missing article (or a bunch of them) that needs to be written.  So many National Championships and Olympic Trials deserve prose but its been formatted out, so far.  I like the way you have changed that in NCAA results and I'd like to expand on that.  From your discussion above, Elizabeth Jackson steeplechaser is one article that is definitely still missing.  I should make a list.


 * We also have a problem, system wide but focusing on our sport, where know-nothings attack our articles and delete content. I feel like a one armed paper hanger here trying to protect content against a marauding band of invaders trying to destroy our knowledge base.  1) do your best to avoid things that go against or even skirt policy.  Contradicting that last statement, sometimes audacity is necessary to convey information (like the colored team representations in the 2018 NCAA results).  If we can make it better, do it.  After you post or visit anything worthwhile, 2) pay attention so you can be ready to 3) defend when necessary. Trackinfo (talk) 22:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I edited the women's 3000 steeple for the Outdoor NCAA Div I finals, but I couldn't locate a cell for Eastern Michigan. I also didn't red link the names of three finishers because there are articles for three others, not athletes, with the same name. I don't have time to do articles for any, I'm afraid. Can you tell me how to find the E. Michigan template (I presume the color would be dark green.) Activist (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, I agree with you that creative stuff is the most important part. Elizabeth Jackson has an article but I agree it could use a lot of expansion (and perhaps a disambiguation redirect from Liz Jackson). For deletions, I just keep an eye on the "Article Alerts" section of the Athletics WP home page and if there's something I feel like was wrongfully nominated I think the best strategy is to just address the nominator's rationale in an update to the article, and then comment saying you did that. I think closing admins tend to favor the side that has improved the article the most, so if you add well-sourced info and reference WP policies I think deletion discussions are usually winnable battles.
 * And, thanks so much for adding that table, I was hoping to get around to that soon. It looks great, but I added some prose, plus a source for the results. For athletes that already have a wiki article of the same name I've just been adding wikilinks like X instead, so I did that for the remaining athletes in the table. And for E. Michigan, the colors are all from Module:College color so you can just look in that page for the right string to use (you can always add "track and field" after it), so I made it Eastern Michigan Eagles. P.S. I've been backlogged on emails recently but will get back to everything after I finish the new Wikidata bot run and some new IRL commitments. Thanks again though! --Habst (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As usual, thank you for your contributions both to the article and to the process and sharing of the available resources. Activist (talk) 07:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Maggie Aiono
Because you participated in Articles for deletion/Alefosio Laki, you may be interested in Articles for deletion/Maggie Aiono. Papaursa (talk) 23:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in study
Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 19:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

WD ontology for sports
Hi, I see your bot updates on P1344 with several qualifiers (for instance, on . Now, I try to deep in the ontology should have the sports results, but also the classes related with structures as, , , , , etc. Unfortunately, projectes as d:Wikidata:WikiProject Sports  or d:Wikidata:WikiProject Sport results seems to be abandoned or to be oriented to upload data on basic structures (person, sport, team,...). In the d:Wikidata:WikiProject Olympics, I can't found specific information about ontology. Ex: Why do you upload all the events of a person in P1344 ?. Some athlete could have hundreds of entries. Or, perhaps, will not be uploaded all the events ?. why do you repeat the result information (as a qualifiers of P1344 in the athletes) when it already exists on the event item?. In summary, if exists any ontology criteria at this level of sport information, do you know where to find it?. Is the Olympics project in early status and still in process to define ?. Any help will be thanks. Amadalvarez (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, apologies for my delay. I also regret that the two projects you linked are inactive, and there is no real ontology for track and field events yet other than the one that my bot defines. Originally, the bot didn't repeat result info on both athlete and meet items, but I added it because someone requested that on the bot proposal page for it to be approved. I use P1344 "participant of" because another requested change was that each "event" at each competition should have its own item, so that it would mesh more easily with existing items and articles like Athletics at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metres. I think the info should still be on the bot's proposal page. I've been pretty inactive recently, but maybe one day I will resume work on wikitrackbot. Habst (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 600 meters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 600 meters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/600 meters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Habst! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Good to see you still editing
I added to Karissa Schweizer's and Allie Ostrander's articles and wondered if you were still editing. I see you weren't for quite a while but have resumed doing so. I hope you got to see Karissa's double in the 5&10. I watched both online and on TV at the same time with a simultaneous but different feed. I watched the steeple as well, as I've followed Ostrander since she was a high schooler doing mountain running. I also noticed that Emily Lipari's article is in draft space. That seemed a bit odd to me, given all the junk covering nonentities* in many fields, and her prominence in track. *The worst I ran across was articles about nobodies who had read a few scripted lines in anime films. Activist (talk) 20:39, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, it's good to hear from you again. That Trials was really something special, I watched every day of coverage so far. I was in high school at the same time as Ostrander so I remember her from then as well, it's a shame she has struggled with eating disorders.
 * I saw the Lipari page was deleted several years ago so I wanted to restore it because she now meets WP:NATH, I'll get to finishing that soon. Fun fact, I once paced Lipari in a track workout a few years ago. I wasn't as fast as her but fast enough to run half the workout, haha. She closed our workout with a ~26 low second 200 and a few years later she won the US road mile championships.
 * Anyways, I've really appreciated your track coverage here, and I'm hoping once I settle down and find a programming job I can spend more time editing, would be nice to make even more detailed Olympic coverage than 5 years ago here. Thanks for checking in. --Habst (talk) 05:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:IAAF points
Template:IAAF points has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:User pages with IAAF identifiers


A tag has been placed on Category:User pages with IAAF identifiers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages with IAAF identifiers


A tag has been placed on Category:Pages with IAAF identifiers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Karissa S
Since you created the Karissa Schweitzer article, I hope you didn't miss her Pre Classic win. She and Alicia Monson really smoked the last 5K. Activist (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Maccabiah Games Athletics
Template:Maccabiah Games Athletics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Green October 2022 Good Article Editathon
 Hello :

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Editathon event in October 2022!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning autobiography by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) & Goldsztajn (talk) 23 September 2022

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on 110 metres hurdles
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 110 metres hurdles, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=110_metres_hurdles&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1156409850%7C110%20metres%20hurdles%5D%5D Ask for help])

WikiProject Women in Green June 2023 Good Article Editathon notification
 Hello :

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Editathon event in June 2023!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – another Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a Bollywood actress? Go for it. A pioneering female climate scientist? Absolutely. An award-winning book or film by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexandre Fayollat


A tag has been placed on Alexandre Fayollat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[WP:LUGSTUBS]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BilledMammal (talk) 10:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Recreation of WP:LUGSTUBS article
Hi Habst,

I see that you have recreated Alexandre Fayollat and George Patching by copying and pasting the content from Draft:Alexandre Fayollat and Draft:George Patching respectively. There are two issues with this.

First, copying and pasting the content, rather than moving, is problematic for attribution purposes; see WP:CUTPASTE. If the articles were to be kept the histories would need to be merged.

Second, the WP:LUGSTUBS consensus requires that sources are added that plausibly demonstrate WP:GNG before the article can be restored to mainspace. The sources you added (binktster, arrs, gbrathletics, la84, and la84) are all statistical databases; GNG is not plausibly demonstrated.

In the future, please do not restore articles drafted under LUGSTUBS unless you are able to plausibly demonstrate GNG, and if you are basing the article on Lugnut's work please make sure to move the article, rather than copying and pasting, to ensure that attribution is given. BilledMammal (talk) 11:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @BilledMammal, both articles clearly meet WP:NATH because one is an Olympic medalist and another finished 4th in the Olympic 100m. As far as I'm aware, the Fayollat article was deleted in error, because WP:LUGSTUBS says "non-medalling Olympians" but he has an Olympic medal. So he never should have been listed at that page to begin with. Also, the LA84 site is not a statistical database, it is the Official Report and it contains prose. I can add other newspaper sources this week, there is significant coverage of these athletes. Thank you for bringing the copying issue to my attention, in the future we will move the articles for attribution.
 * Can you please pause the speedy deletions or note this until the additional sources are added? --Habst (talk) 11:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You're right, Fayollat was caught in error as it lacked the relevant categories; I've removed the CSD from him on that basis. However, the attribution issue remains; I suggest you add the content to the draft before nominating it for deletion under G6 and then moving the draft back to mainspace. The alternative option is a history merge, but those are harder to do and in the case appears to be unnecessary.
 * You're also right about LA84; it does contain some prose. However, as it lacks independence it also cannot plausibly contribute to GNG.
 * I've left the tag on Patching as even if you do add the sources something needs to be done for attribution. I suggest you work on that article in draft space until it is ready for restoration? BilledMammal (talk) 11:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @BilledMammal Thank you for removing the deletion tag on Fayollat's article. For attribution on the Patching article, can't a WP:DUMMY edit be made that simply links to the draft page in the edit summary, so that the attribution is noted and anyone who wants to see the prior history can navigate there?
 * --Habst (talk) Habst (talk) 11:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Probably not, because there is no guarantee the draft won't be deleted. BilledMammal (talk) 12:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @BilledMammal Seeing as there are only a dozen or so edits to the draft, I simply copy/pasted the revision history into Talk:George Patching so there will be a record of the authors even if that page is deleted. --Habst (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George Patching


A tag has been placed on George Patching requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at WP:LUGSTUBS. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BilledMammal (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days
 Hello :

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Template editor granted
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a ping for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/rights&page=User:Habst rights log].


 * Useful links
 * All template-protected pages
 * User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
 * Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! Primefac (talk) 09:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

"Stockholm/G, Sweden" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stockholm/G,_Sweden&redirect=no Stockholm/G, Sweden] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

"Stockholm/S, Sweden" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stockholm/S,_Sweden&redirect=no Stockholm/S, Sweden] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Nov 15: WikiWednesday Salon + Wikimedia NYC Executive Director job
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Mauritz Kåshagen
Please check "what links here" when creating articles about athletes. You will find all the championships pages where the athlete is mentioned. A look at Kåshagen shows that there are a number of international championships which he competed in, that are not mentioned in the article. After all, international competitions are what the athletes strive for. Geschichte (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks, in my recent batch of articles I have always checked Special:WhatLinksHere before creating and I do things like changing any unrelated links (to people with the same name) to add a disambiguation. For Mauritz Kåshagen specifically, I generally only include linked articles in the article body if they are international competitions and the athlete at least earned a medal or is discussed in detail at the article, and Kåshagen never won any medals at the European Athletics Team Championships, European Athletics Championships, or athletics at the Summer Universiade. I made an exception for the World Junior Championships because that was his most prestigious global championship.
 * But you are free to add them if you want to expand the article. I don't know Norwegian but there may be local coverage on his relay win at the 2019 Norwegian Athletics Championships that could be worth including. --Habst (talk) 13:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Win a medal? Any article of any person are to describe everything they did during their career. "Discussed in detail at the article": Which article? What you should be looking for here are secondary References that indeed discuss these participations in smaller or greater detail. A national relay medal "may" have local coverage, yes, but this is true for many other things as well, and the relay would be a very strange point to start the research. Furthermore, the World Junior Championship was not his most prestigious championship as the bar for entering is significantly lower than in senior championships, which by extension are the most prestigious championships. In addition, an article creator can of course say that "somebody else can do the job of adding all this", but then again, articles benefit more from being developed as drafts. Geschichte (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Geschichte Thank you, I agree that we should include as much as possible that's documented. I significantly improved Draft:Mauritz Kåshagen to remove all comments, I added records of all of his nationals finishes, and I described in prose all of the competitions in Special:WhatLinksHere/Mauritz Kåshagen plus several others. I also added several Norwegian-language references about Kåshagen that include some details about his injuries, the circumstances of his participation in the 2016 ECs, and his current activities.
 * I think the World Juniors was Kåshagen's most notable global championship, which is useful to mention because it's the most recognized across the world (especially outside of Europe). However I agree that's hardly what he is most known for, so I included as much as I could find and understand from translating the Norwegian sources.
 * What do you think of the new draft? If you agree that it's sufficient, would you mind moving it back to mainspace? Thank you, --Habst (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Geschichte As the changes requested have been made, I am moving Draft:Mauritz Kåshagen back to mainspace, let me know if there is anything else that can be done to improve the article. Thank you for pointing out these issues. --Habst (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Refrain from unused data
Inserting thousands of bytes of unused data into articles is not a viable strategy in creating articles. You can keep things like that in your user space, a Sandbox or draft space. Please immediately refrain from doing so in actual articles. Geschichte (talk) 07:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Geschichte Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The reason I left some comments was because I thought the data could potentially be repurposed to fit the article in the future, but I see that much of it was unrelated anyways. I have removed all the comments from Draft:Mauritz Kåshagen and I'll keep commented-out data from all of my mainspace content in the future. --Habst (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Wed Dec 6: Hacking Night + job listing
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)