User talk:Hackshaven

Speedy deletion of SciLands
A tag has been placed on SciLands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


 * As the reviewing administrator, I removed the deletion tag, for I think this is a major web activity, with a claim to notability, and might well make a tenable article. However it will need some rewriting. See WP:BFAW for applicable guidelines. It must be written in a different manner than a press release: t must not be written in the second person, it must not use vague phrases about how or useful it is. And it should have references to published 3rd party articles about it--thee should be a number of them findable. I am also not sure a list of all the participants or locations is encyclopedic, but give it a try & see what people think about it. DGG (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I trust DGG's judgement enough to agree to that, but it definitely needs some work. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't know enough about Second Life to be of much help from that end of it. The main thing is that there should be some references from reliable third-party sources such as newspapers, magazines and the like about SciLands. These help to establish SciLands' notability, which helps to determine whether or not SciLands deserves its own Wikipedia article. These are the same kind of references, or footnotes, that are required in academic papers. Click here for a complete description. Also the link to the Google spreadsheet has to go, as many people can't utilize that link for various rechnical reasons — take the information out and put it directly into the article. If it is really long, trim some ofthe less-recognized names. And go easy on the photo galleries, as they can end up being more cluter than useful if you overdo it. That should get you off to a start. Let me know if you need more help. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)