User talk:Hadding

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Plates of Nephi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Edits to Plates of Nephi
The edits you've made to Plates of Nephi do not really pertain to this particular article. I believe you want the article on Golden plates. That is the article that deals with Joseph Smith and the plates, not this one. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 11:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Alfred Ploetz has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Your edits in the article Animal welfare in Nazi Germany should be more careful. While you can certainly remove questionable source, you must have to look the other parts of the article are not destroyed. Compare this version after your edits and this version. Your edit resulted in Cite error in reference section. Be careful about technical aspects, if you continue this behavior, i.e. removal of parts of article without fixing it, it may be considered disruptive edit and your account may be blocked for a period of time.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 15:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Please don't do this again
You have repeatedly attempted to insert false information into the article about Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg. Please stop. It doesn't matter what some foreign correspondent for the NYT mistakenly wrote 90 years ago if we know with certainty that it is false. The only reason to include it in the encyclopedia would be if the false report had turned into an incident in its own right. In that case, some brief mention might be warranted. Otherwise, no. --Goodmorningworld (talk) 17:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 48 hours for blatant disruptive editing, i.e. edit-warring at Posen speeches to insert tendentious WP:OR in support of Holocaust denial. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, on reviewing your contributions further, I'm upping this to indefinitely. We don't need nazi propagandists in this project. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:18, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Life advice
As I'm sure you've discovered before you ever joined Wikipedia, your opinions are widely rejected by just about everyone. This, I perceive, makes you feel that your viewpoint is being unfairly discriminated against. If you're able to do so, consider taking just a few minutes to consider the possibility that the reason that everyone to whom you describe these views recoils from you in horror is because these views are untrue in the factual sense and wrong in the moral sense. Maybe it isn't that the rest of the world is unfairly stigmatizing your truth. Maybe it's that you're badly, badly wrong. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Here is a good refutation of the fraud this editor has been trying to perpetuate. It's an old denier argument: pretend the language doesn't mean what it always meant. --jpgordon:==( o ) 21:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)