User talk:HaeB/Short BLP controversy sections


 * thanks again for your effort. Any chance of a rerun? (Maybe exclude "career" if possible?) –xenotalk 02:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Happy to (running it again should be little work unless there is some unforeseen issue). Excluding "career" should be easy.
 * Any other search terms we should consider including while we're at it; say "scandal", "racist", "sexual", "drug", or "drunk"?
 * Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes please - those are good additions to look at! any other suggests? –xenotalk  10:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * None come to mind, . It'll be interesting to see the new results. Schazjmd   (talk)  13:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Updated - let me know how it goes.
 * By the way, it might also be fairly easy to restrict the search to sections without  citations. Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Might be useful as a dividing criteria, to more quickly highlight the BLP violations. –xenotalk 17:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, ! I'll start on these today. Schazjmd   (talk)  13:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks from me too. This one's unique, look at that External links section. –xenotalk 17:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Whoa, I've never seen anything like that before! Schazjmd   (talk)  17:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Fun how adding "scandal" picked up so many romance novelists.  Schazjmd   (talk)  17:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Scandalous! –xenotalk 17:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Done with my review. I guesstimate I modified around 1/3 of the articles. Thanks, ! Schazjmd   (talk)  17:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)