User talk:Hagtobel

November 2017
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Hans Fässler, from its old location at User:Hagtobel/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  14:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help, Uncle Milty.--Hagtobel (talk) 13:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hans Fässler (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hans Fässler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hans Fässler, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hans_F%C3%A4ssler Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Drover%27s_Wife&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hans_F%C3%A4ssler reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 10:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Hagtobel - thanks for your comment on my talk page. Although your article is very good otherwise, the problem is that it almost completely lacks inline citations, which makes it extremely difficult to verify the article content. For instance, if I (as someone unfamiliar with the content) wanted to check some of the more contentious claims, such as the criminal proceedings against him, I couldn't easily do it: the only inline source in the "politician" section is a speech that only confirms the street renaming - perhaps the least contentious thing in there. To check any specific fact regarding those criminal proceedings, I'd have to read everything in the long list of sources, many of which are offline and difficult to access. Wikipedia needs these higher standards of verifiability because while you probably do the right thing, not everyone does, and we have to be able to check contentious material, especially in articles about living people. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 20:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter if the citations aren't in English - people just need to be able to verify specific claims. This is still easily enough done with proper inline citations making clear which statement is sourced from which reference. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hallo, The Drover's Wife – I have been trying to provide some of the necessary inline references and will continue to do so. Will it be you again who decides on whether the article Draft:Hans Fässler is accepted or declined or will it be somebody else? Thanks and best wishes from wintry Switzerland: HagtobelHagtobel (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hans Fässler has been accepted
 Hans Fässler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Chetsford (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hans_F%C3%A4ssler help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Unsourced change
Hello Hagtobel. Please be aware that this change about the University of St. Gallen presents negative information ('frivolous spending behavior') but includes no source. It is close to a violation of WP:BLP to do this, so please follow up quickly with a published source. Otherwise other editors may revert your change. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have now undone your change, but if you manage to find a source, you may be able to restore it. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)