User talk:Haider Abbas Jafri

May 2014
Thanks for contributing the new article Kokab mehdi. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 21:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Please be aware of the Wikipedia policy on conflicts of interest. Wikipedia has a place where you can go to have articles created if you have a conflict of interest &mdash; namely Articles for creation.  --Bejnar (talk) 02:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kokab mehdi has been reverted. Your edit here to Kokab mehdi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/kokabmehdi) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Kokab mehdi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kokab mehdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kokab mehdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 02:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kokab mehdi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  13:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Also, please do not remove maintenance tags from articles without either:
 * Providing a justification for the removal in the edit summary, or
 * Editing to the article to address the issues raised by your fellow editors.
 * Please realize that creating this article doesn't meant that you "own" it. Please accept the suggestions of other editors to improve the article--doing so will greatly improve the chances or creating a consensus to retain it and not delete it.  Thank you.  -- Finngall   talk  13:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Kokab mehdi. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  21:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Haider Abbas Jafri, you are invited to the Teahouse
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Kokab mehdi, you may be blocked from editing. -- Finngall  talk  22:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Kokab mehdi
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kokab mehdi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://kokabmehdi.blogspot.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kokab mehdi


A tag has been placed on Kokab mehdi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://kokabmehdi.blogspot.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 00:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Kokab mehdi. -- Finngall   talk  01:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Repost of Kokab mehdi
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you.

Note that I do not believe the page is a copyright violation, because the blog is dated 5 June 2014 and the content had appeared on Wikipedia before then. Nevertheless, this is a repost of material that was previously deleted by a deletion discussion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)