User talk:Haiduc/Archives 2004

Welcome to the Wikipedia
Here are some links I find useful


 * Policy Library
 * Cite your sources
 * Verifiability
 * Wikiquette
 * Conflict resolution
 * Brilliant prose
 * Neutral point of view
 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
 * Village pump
 * Boilerplate text

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~.

Cheers, Sam [Spade] 17:29, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

HELLO Haiduc! sORRY THAT I WRITE THERE BUT I DON'T KNOW WHERE I SHOULD! MY NAME IS JACEK!I AM FROM POLAND.SO I DONT KNOW GOOG ENGLICH. I FOUND SOME INFORMATIONS ABOUT RECOGNITION OF SAME SEX PARTNERSHIPS IN COUNTRIES WHITCH HAD BEEN NO LISTED IN CIVIL UNIONS ARTICLE. SO I EXPENDEDTHIS ARTICLE.YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATIONS ABOUT IT IN DISCUSSION IN SAME SEX MARRIAGE PAGE AT THE END!I WAS NOT SINGED THERE.THERE ARE SOME PAGES WHERE YOU CAN FIND THOSE INFORMATIONS WITCH I EXTENDED. AND THE POINT IS THAT YOU CAN CORRECT YOUR MAP ABOUT SAME SEX MARRIAGES-CIVIL UNIONS. TO COMPLITE TE ARTICLE. THANKS. AND SEE YOU SOON. JACK.

euphemist?
As I saw that you used the term "boylover" in the List of self-identified pederasts and pedophiles, do you not think that it is euphemist? In how far do you think is it helpful to link to pedophiles' sites? Get-back-world-respect 00:55, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I was not the source of those adjectives, I only re-named the page to make a distinction in an effort to strive for greater acuracy. As for the balance between using euphemisms and pejoratives, I am in favor of neither. I simply assume that the original authors (of "List of self-identified pedophiles") had valid reasons for making those distinctions. --Haiduc 01:55, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * While "pedophile" is a scientific term, "boylover" is a euphemist label some pedophiles use to defend child abuses. I still cannot see why we need a page that mainly links to pedophiles' websites. Get-back-world-respect 02:08, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I am not qualified to get into a semantic debate colored by political opinion. I did not see a particular need for the article either, but did not want to condone its inaccuracies. Since I am a newcomer to this project I am reluctant to delete in such cases, and restrict myself to making corrections.
 * Good for you Haiduc, its a very controvercial issue as you are aware. Sam [Spade] 04:25, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Greek sperm
Please see my reply @ User_talk:Sam_Spade.

Sam [Spade] 18:48, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)