User talk:Haiku Tea

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wayne Ray has been reverted. Your edit here to Wayne Ray was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://mysteryunltd.tripod.com/maridon/publications.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes I have access to a History of HMS and CPA publishing and these were verification links to articles. I will be doing this to other Canadian Poets to verify their notability, not just this one. I reverted the chnge as these are real source materials. Haiku Tea (talk) 01:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wayne Ray, you may be blocked from editing. The links you added either had nothing to do with the article, or linked to "HMS Press", which you have used here as your personal email address. Please take a moment to read Conflict of interest. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I am cleaning up known Canadian poets and Happen to know HMS Press and Mr. Ray. I added publisher to Category and someone deleted it saying he was not a publisher on the grounds that it was not on the Biio page, so I added the word publisher and some references from a forthcoming book on the history of London Ontario publishing. I didn't mean for them to look like ads, only references to his publishing company which is actually in an already existing citation. Apologies. Haiku Tea (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Western Fair Archives list of photographs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Fair Archives list of photographs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Western Fair Archives list of photographs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Animalparty-- (talk) 11:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Arts Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Catherine Inculet


A tag has been placed on Catherine Inculet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 16:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Catherine Inculet. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 16:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to be rude (Twit) but you didn't put the notice on the page. I went and looked and it was just the article itself, so your fault not mine i never removed anything Haiku Tea (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Really? Before you continue to call people names while editing Wikipedia articles, please read WP:AGF and also review your actions before embarrassing yourself.   shows the CSD was removed by you.  red dogsix (talk) 22:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Catherine Inculet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catherine Inculet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Catherine Inculet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)