User talk:Hailshambob

Welcome!
Hello, Hailshambob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Charles (talk) 22:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Hailsham, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 13:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610618488 your edit] to Hailsham may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * * 1264: Benedict the Jew of "Heylesham" was "outlawed" would have been for clipping the King’s coin.

May 2014
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hailsham. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Charles (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hailsham with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪  ߷  ♀ 投稿 ♀ 10:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Please read our policies.
Hi Bob

I advise you to take a break from editing to read our policies on verifiability and other policies linked in the welcome message. If you continue edit warring at Hailsham you are just going to get yourself blocked. Regards.--Charles (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Yunshui 雲 水 13:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hailsham and other stories
I am somewhat perturbed to see that the dispute, edit war, call it what you will, has spilled onto another editor's talk page as what I perceive to be a personal attack on them. I saw this because their page is on my watch list. I don't know them, nor have any relationship with them except in passing and I have no idea what their views may be. We deprecate personal attacks. No-one likes them.

I don't care about your or their religious affiliations, genuinely do not care. But I do care about decorum, the assumption of good faith and much else here that makes editing a pleasant pastime. If you feel that reporting this storm in a teacup is the right thing to do, report it, though I am not sure to whom. Note that such reports can rebound in an awkward manner, and that the behaviours of all, by which I mean all, concerned fall under scrutiny.

Resolve your issues by discussion, not with a cricket bat, please.

Who am I to ask this?

No-one at all. Just someone who sees that you may be standing too close to the fire on this matter.

By the way, it is customary to sign talk page messages. I imagine you forgot because you are upset about the underlying matter. Please do try to remember to add ~ to sign messages on talk pages. Fiddle  Faddle  14:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)