User talk:Haivanessa

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Haivanessa/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Haivanessa/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/harvard-startup-house-hunters-tiny-home-size/story?id=35078247. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Brooke Saward
Hello, I have tried to edit the page you created in order to bring it more into line with Wikipedia's manual of style. If you have not read that page, please take a look at it. You will need to place the refs. within the ref tags at the points within the text that they apply. Please see WP:REFB for a basic guide to citing sources. There should also not be external links within the text and Wikilinks (E.g. University of Tasmania should only be linked at the first mention. There also seems to be some discrepancy over the name (Brooke or Broke?) and in any event the surname should be used within the text. Eagleash (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brooke Saward


The article Brooke Saward has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Australian travel writer. No real evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 06:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Brooke Saward for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brooke Saward is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brooke Saward until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 03:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Comment
I've removed your comment from my talk page, please read WP:Civil. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  19:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, I saw the message you left on Jimfbleak's talk page, and it seems you pretty much were mad at the deletion of your page. He deleted it because it was advertising or promotion. He is also under absolutely no obligation to restore your page just because you worked hard on it. I mean, people work hard on hoaxes, but that doesn't mean that they should be on Wikipedia. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  19:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)