User talk:Haj Atar

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mauritania was changed by Haj Atar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852454 on 2013-02-28T00:34:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mauritania with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nick—Contact/Contribs 00:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mauritania with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  Eye snore  (pending changes) 01:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mauritania shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 06:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)