User talk:Hajhouse

Messages for me
Thanks for your copyediting -- it's appreciated! BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 04:46, Mar 27, 2004 (UTC)

move
Hi, you copied the contents of Suit (clothes) to Suit (clothing). It is recommended that instead of copying text you "move" a page (there is a "move" button at the top), this way also the edit history and the talk page is preserved. (See also Help:Moving a page) --128.139.226.37 16:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the tip! I never saw that button until you pointed it out.

Permission
Hello, I wanted to use your organic farming picture in a website that my college class is putting online. I know that it's in public domain but the webmaster of our site wants your name and some proof of dialogue that we contacted those who took the pictures we are using, so that she knows from whom we got all our pictures from. If you could email me that would be best (I should have an email feature) as soon as you can I would appreciate it, thanks so much! --msmgore 22:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Do we really need "Red" next to a red diagram
Re your recent change to Daylight saving time:

Do we really need to label a red region "red"? For all but blind readers its obvious; and blind readers cannot see the map so they cannot use the fact that it's red. Eubulides 17:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I think it's helpful because not all browsers in current use support the unicode characters used in the legend. The colored boxes do not display properly in such browsers.


 * Which browsers are those? I just checked the first 10 Wikipedia pages that use the "legend" template, namely, Alphabet, Asia, Afghanistan, Anschluss, American Civil War, Antarctic Treaty System, Austria-Hungary, Black Sea, Battle of Stalingrad, and Balkans. None of them have the name of the color next to the color in the legend. The browser problem you mention is therefore going to be shared by a lot of Wikipedia pages, and it should be fixed in the implementation of "legend" rather than in all its uses. (Also, on a monochrome display, saying "red" and "blue" is actually incorrect.) Eubulides 06:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal Types of restaurants with Restaurant
Hello, Looking at your nomination in regards to these articles, you failed to properly set up the merge proposal. You need to tag both the articles: on the article that you want to eliminate and  on the one you want to merge the information into.

I set up the template on the restaurant article and put the merge proposal discussion on the talk page, so please put your reasons for proposing the merger and any comments you would like to make.

Thanks, Jeremy (Jerem43 18:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC))

Sheridan, California
A template has been added to the article Sheridan, California, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. -- Pepve 22:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Bricsys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pastordavid (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Your user page
I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 16:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

United States Geographical MOS
A while back ago, you were involved in a discussion about how to refer to the United States Geographical locations on wikipedia. A similar discussion is taking place here. Any comments on this topic would be helpful.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

World Market listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World Market. Since you had some involvement with the World Market redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Edge of Dawn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edge of Dawn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edge of Dawn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 02:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)