User talk:Hajimeko

June 2020
If you're not a sock puppet, why did you go directly that page and restore the edits made by a blocked editor? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

I was not aware that another person was making the same edit. I thought Acretion was making new claims which are clearly biased against the subject at hand so I reversed it to an older version. It is might first time making an account and I have stated my proof of being a different person by my edits on the Vietnamese Wiki page.


 * And you were watching that page on enwiki without ever having made an edit, and without seeing the previous disruption from the blocked editor, to make your very first edit?  Acroterion   (talk)   12:46, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Got outa bed ti say that your proof proves nothing, How 'bout a WP:TOPICBAN on NoFap particularly and human sexuality in general? What constructive edits would you make. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 13:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

As I said I am new to editing in Wikipedia, I see there's a clear bias which you guys are still not addressing therefore I saw that removal was necessary. I did not notice that the person to which version I had reverted back to had made multiple reversions back until I was banned for no reason and sock puppetry is a completely new concept to me. You did not address that person's concern when he made the edit and just reverted it so I thought you - Acretion was the troll. The arguments in that article there were all one sided and respectable studies like the Max Planck Institute Studies,... were all omitted, and I was looking to make further edits until I got banned for no reason.