User talk:Hajosmit

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willem Middelkoop (August 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Willem Middelkoop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Willem_Middelkoop Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Willem_Middelkoop reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for looking into this page so quickly. This helps me improving the article as a first in a series about internationally famous (living) Dutch people. I started based on the Dutch page which has more references. I removed some of those references because they are entirely Dutch. Was this a stupid thing to do?  Can I just give links to Dutch articles as a reference in an English text? If so I will sometime this or next week update the page and make it suitable for wikipedia. There are some English sources for Willem Middelkoop of course too. Mostly interviews on social media. Can I use those as a reference too?  Hajosmit (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Great! Thanks for the encouragement. Hajosmit (talk) 09:41, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Commodity Discovery Fund for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commodity Discovery Fund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Commodity Discovery Fund until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello Hajosmit. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hajosmit. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)


 * To put things straight: I do the Wikipedia editing for Willem Middelkoop and Commodity Discovery Fund pro bono. I do not recieve any compensation for it. In the deletion discussion page I have merely indicated that I have met Willem Middelkoop at some point. And that I have done some paid copywriting directly fr the fund in the past. I once made a brochure and I wrote a blog post. Back from that time I retain a high interest in matters relating to commodities and monetary issues. So I decided om my own part to improve Willem Middelkoops Dutch Wikipedia post. My edits there have been welcomed and accepted. Then I first did a Willem Middelkoop page in English, and after that got rejected (it wasn't adequately sourced), I started on an objective well sourced English page on Commodity Discovery Fund, after I checked that many comparable small funds have Wikipedia pages. I don't mind disclosing that in the past I have done some paid work for this company. How can I mark there that I am not paid for my work on Wikipedia?         Hajosmit (talk) 19:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

 * Hello, Hajosmit,
 * You know, AFDs are not the best place to ask questions about policies on Wikipedia and how things work here. Discussion in an AFD has to be focused on determining the notability of articles and whether they should be kept, merged or deleted.
 * However, the Teahouse is set up as a forum for newer editors to ask questions of experienced editors to get advice and support. I recommend you bring your questions there. Rather than asking a question of one other editor, you have the entire pool of editors who frequent the Teahouse who are available to respond so the knowledge pool is greater. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. Will do. May I invite you to weigh in on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Discovery_Fund and whether it can be retained? I really feel it's notable and well sourced. Yet it is no Goldman Sachs or Blackrock.   Hajosmit (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Skiing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HopsonRoad (talk) 21:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Excuse me many times... I just tried to show to a friend how Wikipedia works. I write "skiing sucks" or something and never wanted to publish that. Then later I made a small grammar improvement. That I wanted to publish to show to my friend. Then the first bullshit edit was published too. So I immediately undid that action. Vandalism was never my intention!  Hajosmit (talk) 07:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Willem Middelkoop
Hello, Hajosmit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Willem Middelkoop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Willem Middelkoop


Hello, Hajosmit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Willem Middelkoop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)