User talk:Haldrik/Archive 1

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:
 * If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
 * Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
 * To sign your name on a talk page, please finish your comments with Tome rtalk 08:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC) (four tildes). The wiki will insert a link to your userpage and the timestamp.
 * Not every subject needs its own page. Sometimes it is wiser to deal with certain subjects together on one page. See Merge and Redirect for some background. You may want to review Avoiding common mistakes to get started quickly.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Enjoy! If you need any help, please don't hesitate to contact me at User talk:TShilo12. :-)          - Tom e rtalk  08:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Frotteurism
Thanks...I hadn't noticed that there was a separate article for Frot. Tom e rtalk 08:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Me neither. Regarding Tribadism, you might want to use the "Show preview" more often; this avoind using server space and ressources storing all the intermediate versions. Thank you for your contributions ! Rama 11:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Etymologies out of synch in Cannabis (drug) and Cannabis
Please see Talk:Cannabis -SM 07:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Jesus
Thank you for your recent edit re:the second paragraph of Jesus. I do not dispute your edit (I leave that for others if they wish), but I do want to point out that the paragraph has been the subject of considerable debate which is nearing consensus. Arch O. La 05:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Update: That discussion is now in the archives. A discussion has been started (and possibly tabled) about 1st century Jewish politics re:Jesus. Arch O. La 16:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

When Rob is Back
Just a reminder: do not respond to Rob at all if he repeats old arguments or gets abusive. If he changes a consensus paragraph, revert it. Keep track of your reverts and only do it twice. If we can do this, nothing will come of it except frustration for Rob. --CTSWyneken 20:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Jesus Talk Vote (again)
We're reaching a consensus vote that just might stick. Please come and vote. --CTSWyneken 14:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Unfriendly accusations of vandalism
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jewish views of Jesus. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 18:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Also be aware that continually reverting the same content may cause you to violate the three-revert rule. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

You are not to remove warnings from your talk page. This is considered vandalism as well. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

These so-called "vandal warnings" by ESkog and Jossi are mistaken, and they may be harassment. Please assume good faith. --Haldrik 18:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Your edits which claimed to be refactoring discussions actually were removing 6109 bytes of information. Whether you intended to or not, you were removing comments, and then re-removed them when you were reverted. We aren't warning you to be unfriendly, but to let you know that your actions are running afoul of some Wikipedia policies. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * If that's true, that was my error, and I appreciate you correcting it. --Haldrik 18:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, I was in the process of pasting that missing text, which included "Tests of a true or false prophet", when the reverts interrupted my editing. --Haldrik 19:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I apologize for the misunderstanding then. Our bot on IRC watches for any mass additions/deletions from articles, and we may not always check as closely as we ought to when we revert, in the interest of time. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

A friendly notice about Edit Summaries
Please can you considering using Edit Summaries? It's optional, but looking at a page like this it just shows lots of edits and it's difficult to track who is doing what. Thanks for the understanding. His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Pretty please? His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 13:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not in the habit yet but will work on it. ;) --Haldrik 14:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * PS, I'll restrict the m for minor edits without a summary, for cleaning up grammar and diction, without change in the text's current meaning. I'll make use summaries if I introduce any change in meaning. --Haldrik 14:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very greatly appreciated. -- His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)