User talk:Halibut Thyme

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hyenaste (tell) 00:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

about Jack and Jill: The True Story Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  + + Lar: t/c 02:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Edit Summary Request
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 19:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Mike Wazowski
Why do you keep removing the redirect from Mike Wazowski? There's no useful content there. The article as it is now is too short. Powers 20:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Clam Pond
If you need to experiment with page creation/layout, please use the Sandbox before you start creating empty pages with little to no text beforehand. Cheers,  Netsnipe  (Talk)  17:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Page moves
Please use the move page function in future, instead of copy-paste, which loses the edit history (I've fixed it in this case). Evercat 14:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

You moved Long Island (Boston)
Hi Halibut Thyme. I am not sure why you moved the main article for Long Island (Boston) to reside in Long Island, Massachusetts without discussion. There may be many "Long Islands" in Massachusetts and there is no set canonical form for such titles yet as far as I know. Also you didn't fix up the other articles which pointed to it. Please advise. Best. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc 20:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Pointless edits
Hi, just thought you ought to know that many of your recent edits such as this one you made to Tropical Storm Arlene (2005) are completely pointless. They make no difference to how the article displays at all and as such are a waste of time.--Nilfanion (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Lightning McQueen Early.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lightning McQueen Early.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Do NOT violate consensus
Re. your recent edits to Tropical Storm Chris (2006), there is a consensus to keep it merged (see Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season). Further reverts may get you blocked for violating consensus. – Chacor 13:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * By the way, you are welcom to help us at User:Hurricanehink/Sandbox, where we are temporarily holding the article. – Chacor 14:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Warning
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information, as you did to 2006_Pacific_hurricane_season, worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

The particular edit in question is this. – Chacor 02:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Never on Tuesday
I've amended your changes to this film, added Brad Wyman to the list of producers and removed the rather large "a Brad Wyman Film" box since this is a fairly small film stub and Brad Wyman was only one of three producers of this film (If you want to just add a catergory then go ahead) but the info box does over dominate the page? [or do I add a similar box for all the cast, director, writer and other producers ;-)] Jaster 08:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kate Pal Arthur.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Kate Pal Arthur.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits to 2006 Pacific hurricane season and Hurricane Ioke
I have reverted your recent edits to add a non-existent template. Please don't create it; there is no consensus for it - the Pacific isn't the Atlantic. – Chacor 13:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Lightning McQueen Early.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lightning McQueen Early.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Chacor 13:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
I've added the "prod" template to the article Meteor Vineyards, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Meteor Vineyards. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 09:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Old Malmok.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Old Malmok.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Simpsons episode list templates (TfD nomination)
Hi. I noticed you made this template: Template:The Simpsons season 1. Why? All Simpsons episode articles already have their respective season's episode lists in their infoboxes at the top right. The template seem redundant, and now that anon users have started adding it to S1 articles, it seems to become somewhat of an annoyance. Baffled, I was originally going to post it on Articles for Deletion, but I wanted to head what you had to say. — Mütze 10:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:The Simpsons season 1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Mütze 15:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kuskov House.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kuskov House.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:X-Ray Holes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:X-Ray Holes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

ethan my blah blah blah is blah blah blah wikiblah blah blah blah blah fjsibjhmrlu fghjsufghdfsghdsjfhdsfjk hdsgjkhdfsfgjdshfdsjkfh dghreytr7 t57 tyrgyrggfjghfjkgh 5 yt589658673w gh fnjvdhrsgiuhrliggfdgfg

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CallisterSimpsons.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CallisterSimpsons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Khleothomaszeroholescropped.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Khleothomaszeroholescropped.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Seidenstud 01:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The Village Barbershop
Another editor has added the " " template to the article The Village Barbershop, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Monty Python and the Holy Grail character
A tag has been placed on Template:Monty Python and the Holy Grail character requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Stanley Yelnats' Survival Guide to Camp Green Lake
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stanley Yelnats' Survival Guide to Camp Green Lake, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Stanley Yelnats' Survival Guide to Camp Green Lake. Thisisborin9 talk 03:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Stanley Yelnats' Survival Guide to Camp Green Lake
I have nominated Stanley Yelnats' Survival Guide to Camp Green Lake, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Stanley Yelnats' Survival Guide to Camp Green Lake. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Thisisborin9 talk 03:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Venus-CA.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Venus-CA.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Brad Wyman.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brad Wyman.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ja Ga talk 07:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:DSCN1741.JPG
File:DSCN1741.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Clam Pond at sunrise.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

File:DSCN5474.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSCN5474.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. – Quadell (talk) 14:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Willy Wonka character


A tag has been placed on Template:Willy Wonka character requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  • S • C  • A • R  • C • E •   03:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Hoodwinked characters
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Hoodwinked characters. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of Hoodwinked characters. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lanai City from Ko'ele Stables.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lanai City from Ko'ele Stables.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Peanuts character
Template:Peanuts character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:HathawayHeaven.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HathawayHeaven.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:HathawayHeaven.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HathawayHeaven.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 18:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rodney Robots.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rodney Robots.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Shrek character
Template:Infobox Shrek character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Anchovy-monterey.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anchovy-monterey.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Halminkel.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Halminkel.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Blue Oak School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Oak School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Blue Oak School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Roald Dahl childrens book
Template:Roald Dahl childrens book has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 13:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Challenger 51-L.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Challenger 51-L.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Alefhebrew2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alefhebrew2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Bloonstdfan360  (talk • contribs) 23:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John H. N. Fisher


A tag has been placed on John H. N. Fisher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John H. N. Fisher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John H. N. Fisher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John H. N. Fisher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 11:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John H. N. Fisher
Hello Halibut Thyme,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John H. N. Fisher for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of John H. N. Fisher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John H. N. Fisher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John H. N. Fisher& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John H. N. Fisher


A tag has been placed on John H. N. Fisher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Toddst1 (talk) 04:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Blue Oak School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Oak School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Blue Oak School& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sally Carrera


The article Sally Carrera has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The sources do not justify this article passing WP:SIGCOV nor WP:NOTPLOT. WP:BEFORE only revealed brief coverage that does not support a full length Wikipedia article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Doc Hudson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doc Hudson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Doc Hudson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 🍕 Boneless Pizza! 🍕 (🔔) 03:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)