User talk:Halleana

Speedy deletion of Taurus/Gemini Cusp
A tag has been placed on Taurus/Gemini Cusp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gary King (talk) 15:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Underwood Walker
A tag has been placed on Underwood Walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Undeath (talk) 16:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Mesha (astrology)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mesha (astrology), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.findyourfate.com/indianastro/rasis-char.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Vrishabha (astrology)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vrishabha (astrology), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.surabiastrology.com/houses.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Karkata (astrology)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Karkata (astrology), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.surabiastrology.com/houses.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Vrishaba (astrology)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vrishaba (astrology), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.findyourfate.com/indianastro/rasis-char.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Rowan Tree
A tag has been placed on The Rowan Tree requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 14:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. ''Please stop creating "Celtic Tree Astrology" pages. The "Tree Calendar" was invented by Robert Graves, and popularized by those ignorant of Celtic culture. It is not an encyclopedic subject, at least not in the way you are going about it. '' -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 22:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Chrispianos H. Walker
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chrispianos H. Walker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Chrispianos H. Walker. -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 23:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Encyclopedia
Well, you can start by not infringing material, because for legal reasons we cannot accept copyrighted text. If you want, do research, and create a page with cites/refs, and adheres to the neutral point of view. Stub articles are acceptable, or they will be speedily deleted per WP:CSD or WP:CSD, depending. Good luck. If you need more advice, feel free to ask on my talk page! &mdash; B o L 04:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Cite your sources
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Pairadox (talk) 22:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Cusp articles
I am concerned about your again starting to create a bunch of new, unsourced, "Cusp" articles. It looks to me like others were deleted as redundant with the signs they covered. Are you sure these need to be new articles, and wouldn't be better as additions to existing articles? I'm also concerned that the ones I saw don't look to be written in an encyclopedic fashion. For instance, paragraphs like,
 * "Individuals born under this cusp are thought to be flirtatious, affectionate, energertic, enthusiastic, caring, inquistive, friend-oriented, loves to enterain/theatrical, intelligent, excitability, versatile, witty, youthful, light-hearted, ambidextorous, charming, magnetism, whole-hearted, dynamic, seductive, opinionated, nice, bubbly, leadership, brave, cheerful, sensual, straight-forward, expressive, eloquent, intuitive, creative, brilliant, bright, spontaneous, critical, playful, dynamic, proud, thoughtful, logical, humorous, quirky, different. These individuals are prone to be worriers, aggressive, inconsiderate, irresponsible/immature, reckless, mean, too-spontaneous, non-commitable over-indulgent, careless, devious, caculating, exaggerating, goal-less, prone to drift, trouble-maker, insecure, uncontrolled, play-mind-games, restless, loud,"

aren't encyclopedic.)

I'm going to look them over, but I'm asking you to not create new article unless you have WP:RS and WP:V sources in them, can write in a more reader-friendly fashion, and have checked to see that similar articles already exist. OK? -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 06:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

P.S. - From what I've seen, all these unsourced stubs you're creating are already covered in the Cusp (astrology) article. Therefore, I am redirecting them, and I ask you to make any (sourced!) improvements there. If a section in Cusp (astrology) gets large enough to warrant its own article, take it to the talk page so people can agree if there's a need to fork a section off. -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 06:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Final warning
I really don't want to discourage you from editing here but I'd like to reiterate what other editors have said further up this talk page and Kathryn's reply to you on her talk page. You have continued to add sources which are not reliable or verifiable by Wikipedia standards since other editors have warned you about this as well as adding content which is blatantly plagarized. This really is not acceptable behaviour. If you continue to do these things you will be blocked from contributing to Wikipedia for a period of time.

I'm going to add a welcome message below to help you get oriented. Please read the links and try to get a sense of the standards on Wikipedia. While anyone is able to edit Wikipedia, please understand that your contributions will also almost certainly be changed by other editors here. I'd also encourage you to use talk pages on articles to discuss controversial or drastic revisions of articles. Wikipedia is, first and foremost, an encyclopedia. It also runs on consensus which means that many conflicts of opinion about content are resolved through discussion on talk pages. Starting pages which are not seen as necessary will result in them being deleted. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them on my talk page. Click on the little red Mercury symbol in my signature to get there. Cheers, Pigman ☿ 03:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)