User talk:Hallows AG/Archive 8

International Monetary Fund
I see that you reverted some of my edits to the IMF page. Among the things you removed, one of the sections was the "Functions" section. The main function of Wikipedia is to educate the public and yet you felt that adding a section about the function of the IMF was not a valid edit? I disagree with your edit on my page; a Functions section is very much needed on the current IMF page. Before I started my edits, it was not obvious what the IMF actually did. In order for the Wikipedia page to accurately give the IMF's definition, it needs to say what it does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuincyC (talk • contribs) 18:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied at talkpage.-- Hallows Aktiengesellschaft ( talk ) 21:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Full Sail University
Hi Hallows AG. You may recall our previous conversation here. Thank you for your recent edits on the Full Sail University page. Would you be willing to review the other suggestions made for the Criticism section here? --Tylergarner (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I should get to that in a couple of days, Cheers, Hallows Aktiengesellschaft  ( talk ) 21:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, any assistance would be greatly appreciated. --Tylergarner (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ If you require any assistance in the future, do not hesitate to ask. Cheers, Hallows Aktiengesellschaft  ( talk ) 19:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Two
Hi! Welcome to the second edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse! You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. -- Sarah (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Teahouse celebrates one month of being open! This first month has drawn a lot of community interest to the Teahouse. Hosts & community members have been working with the project team to improve the project in many ways including creating scripts to make inviting easier, exploring mediation processes for troubling guests, and best practices regarding mentoring for new editors who visit the Teahouse.
 * First month metrics report an average of 30 new editors visiting the Teahouse each week. Approximately 30 new editors participate in the Teahouse each week, by way of asking questions and making guest profiles. An average of six new questions and four new profiles are made each day. We'd love to hear your ideas about how we can spread the word about the Teahouse to more new editors.
 * Teahouse has many regulars. Like any great teahouse, our Teahouse has a 61% return rate of guests, who come back to ask additional questions and to also help answer others' questions. Return guests cite the speedy response rate of hosts and the friendly, easy to understand responses by the hosts and other participants as the main reasons for coming back for another cup o' tea!
 * Early metrics on retention. It's still too early to draw conclusions about the Teahouse's impact on new editor retention, but, early data shows that 38% of new editors who participate at the Teahouse are still actively editing Wikipedia 2-4 weeks later, this is compared with 7% from a control group of uninvited new editors who showed similar first day editing activity. Additional metrics can be found on the Teahouse metrics page.
 * Nine new hosts welcomed to the Teahouse. Nine new hosts have been welcomed to the Teahouse during month one: Chicocvenancio, Cullen328, Hallows AG, Jeffwang, Mono, Tony1, Worm That Turned, Writ Keeper, and Nathan2055. Welcome to the Teahouse gang, folks!
 * Say hello to the new guests at the Teahouse. Take the time to welcome and get to know the latest guests at the Teahouse. Drop off some wikilove to these editors today, as being welcomed by experienced editors is a really nice way to make new editors feel welcome.

SPEARTIP
I don't think hoax applies - they say it's fiction at the bottom. I've prodded it as unpublished fiction, having declined a speedy for A7 as it isn't webcontent yet. Peridon (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * My mistake. I tagged the page earlier with G11 and was deleleted but was recreated. the content on the article's talk page gives me the idea that this user is wishes to promote the subject.-- Hallows Aktiengesellschaft ( talk ) 10:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Gone as spam. Author blocked for spam and name. Peridon (talk) 11:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your review at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Blues Orphans
I just re-submitted an entry for The Blues Orphans. Will you please let me know that you got it. Also, about how long before you let me know if it will be posted on Wikipedia? Thanks. -Todd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spivakt (talk • contribs) 22:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You need to place more sources to the article to establIsh the notability of the subject. the article currently has none. Feel free to contact me again once the article has been sourced. Cheers, Hallows Aktiengesellschaft  ( talk ) 22:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)