User talk:Hallows AG/Archive 9

Brian F. Harris article
Thank you for letting me know where the previous article was lacking. I have revised the article so that it is based on reliable sources that provide evidence of notability and will be posting it under the name Brian F. Harris today (without the Dr. as you suggested). Please let me know if you have any comments on the strength of the references. Gogecko1 (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Tom Mariano
Hey Hallows AG Tankyou so much for removing the tag you did on the page i have been working on A.K.A Tom Mariano. Some new tags showed up and as you know I'm new to this and really have been working hard. First off can you look at the page Tom Mariano and please tell me how get the new tags off LOL. Also i own pics Of Tom Mariano and seems everytime i put one up the get delted yet i follow the rules. Well i think i do. Any help would be great and i hope to take to you soon. A.K.A Kim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadanoops (talk • contribs) 23:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sidney Alford
Hello! Your submission of Sidney Alford at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:46, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Article rejected -Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans
Hi,

I have tried twice to submit an article on the organisation called the Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans. The second time, I included an extensive list of references including a variety of websites, an on-line brochure and an article published in a magazine called the Marine Scientist (publication of the Institute of Marine Engineering Science and Technology). Twice the article was rejected on the grounds that it doesn't cite reliable sources. I find this hard to understand, especially since other similar organisations such as the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the Global Ocean Observing System provide NO references and somehow their articles were accepted. I would be grateful if you could give me some specific reasons WHY my article has been rejected, and how I can modify it. The somewhat a generic response saying it doesn't cite reliable sources isn't terribly helpful. Thank you Sophisee (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Attack Cat


The article Attack Cat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability beyond a single member.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mabdul 01:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC) PS:Only informing you, but doesn't look that good!

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

New Pages update
Hey :). A quick update on how things are going with the New Page Triage/New Pages Feed project. As the enwiki page notes, the project is divided into two chunks: the "list view" (essentially an updated version of Special:NewPages) and the "article view", a view you'll be presented with when you open up individual articles that contains a toolbar with lots of options to interact with the page - patrolling it, adding maintenance tags, nominating it for deletion, so on.

On the list view front, we're pretty much done! We tried deploying it to enwiki, in line with our Engagement Strategy on Wednesday, but ran into bugs and had to reschedule - the same happened on Thursday :(. We've queued a new deployment for Monday PST, and hopefully that one will go better. If it does, the software will be ready to play around with and test by the following week! :).

On the article view front, the developers are doing some fantastic work designing the toolbar, which we're calling the "curation bar"; you can see a mockup here. A stripped-down version of this should be ready to deploy fairly soon after the list view is; I'm afraid I don't have precise dates yet. When I have more info, or can unleash everyone to test the list view, I'll let you know :). As always, any questions to the talkpage for the project or mine. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC)