User talk:Halmarzo/sandbox

Article Evaluation

The link of the reviewed article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Abdullah_University_of_Science_and_Technology

My evaluation was done on King Abdullah University of Science and Technology for History of Architecture in the University of Wyoming (ARE 3030) with professor Tdenzer~ The article is it has been evaluated by me look neutral and there are no obvious claims that appear biased. In general, there is no viewpoints of an individual or any viewpoints that seem to be underrepresented or overrepresented. The citations of the article have been reviewed, and I attempted to check all the links and I found that link 13,14,15, and 17 does not lead me to the source of the information that was claimed in the article. however, some of these cited articles take me to the homepage of the cited article publisher rather to the information source. The neutrality of the cited article are not biased, but the university website could show some biased claims. However, those claims are not present in the article. The conversation of the article is as described in public and expected, there is no irrelevant or misleading information about the article.

Question: King Abdulaziz University of Science and Technology is an evolutionary university that was established in 2009 because it is the first university in Saudi Arabia that is considered mixed gender. Would it be biased if the article has a section that describes how the university support equality of gender and discuss the implementation of this idea in an ultra conservative Muslim country?

Thank you, Hussain Almarzooq Halmarzo (talk) 03:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)