User talk:Hamandcheesemachine

AfD nomination of Queer Dale
An article that you have been involved in editing, Queer Dale, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Queer Dale. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * It's not deleted... yet. This AfD is a chance for any Wikipedian to review the article and determine whether it merits deletion based on the reasons I gave.  Please feel free to participate in the discussion.  Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If you can provide web links, that would be very helpful in determining notability. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Queer Dale hoax
If you insist on carrying on like this, I advise you to make your next edit on the subject contain some genuine evidence. One more disruptive post claiming that you have found information on the internet, but conveniently failing to provide a link, and I will block you for trolling. --Stormie (talk) 02:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

I have provdied TWO links on the Queer Dale deletion talk page OK?!

A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

BUNCH OF HOMOPHOBES!--Hamandcheesemachine (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to address this without retorting. Read the notability criteria.  That's the only thing governing this.  If you would just read -- and ask questions if you don't understand -- instead of trying to have your way here, you'd get along much better.  Accusing people you don't know of bigotry is in itself bigoted, and I for one do not appreciate it.  Please, understand the purpose of Wikipedia, and get over it, already. It's really not that important! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

ITS IMPORTANT TO ME!--Hamandcheesemachine (talk) 21:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * All caps is considered shouting and RUDE. If it really is that important to you, then please read all critieria, rules, principles, etc., etc. carefully , and get yourself ironclad proof of their existence AND notability per Wikipedia standards.  With that, no one has any reason at all to oppose the material, and for the record, no one here even knows who you are, so try not to take personal offense to stuff here.  That's what I meant by 'it's not that important.'  Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for capitals. But i have had happy editing since all this curfuffle over Queer Dale. Trying to contribute with a perfectly good article compared to some rubbish that gets kept on here. Why did it have to be deleted, people go straight to Wikipedia to find out information, if Queer Dale aint on here, then how can they find out about them? Looks homophobic to me.--Hamandcheesemachine (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Some people see drama/bigotry/malice where there is none. Wikipedia has a policy, that of assuming good faith on the part of our fellow editors.  I personally have no reason to suspect that you are attempting to publish deliberately false information; conversely I expect that you presume that I am operating solely on the guidelines of Wikipedia, and am not trying to subvert subject matter that I may or may not favor or oppose.  We are strictly held to Wikipedia's notability criteria, which must be backed up by verifiable, reliable sources.  Read those links, because they explain what kids of sources, with what sorts of information, Wikipedia's policy requires.  This has nothing to do with the type of material presented; Wikipedia is not censored for content that some may find objectionable, and our dedication to reporting reliable information about notable subjects is a principle that precludes personal bias, for or against any material. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I know that Wikipedia has its guidlines which must be met, but those who deleted my Queer Dale page and participated in the deletion discussion seemed very big headed and portrayed there opinions very nastily. I hate those who think they know everything and do not know half of the situation. I quote from The deletion discussion...."There is still no assertion of notability."-Well actually there is, seeming as I have wrote about there notability..........."almost certain hoax (the top 40 claims are false and the two pictures don't even look to me like the same set of guys) but in any case absolutely not notable"-Um well incase you havnt noticed, human beings grow old, change looks,some get fatter,some get thinner, some end up needing glasses, hair gets greyer, skin gets wrinklier...so no obvioulsy there not going to look the same as they did from a picture taking late 80s............"Oh, and for the record that banner behind the band in your photo looks quite a lot like it's been Photoshopped on to me"-My PC is too old to even handly Photoshop let alone me being able to afford it. And NO the photo doesnt seem to be photoshoped as I found it on the internet and was at the actuall event myself where i saw that banner wth my own 2 eyes. This comes accross as very arrogant to me to be honest, fair enough you deletd the page, nothing I can do about it now, but if Wikipedia are going to 'employ staff' like that, Id spit in there faces...Im just putting my opinion across....--Hamandcheesemachine (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Michael Machell Britains Got Talent
A tag has been placed on Michael Machell Britains Got Talent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rob Banzai (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

OMG YOUR ALL SAD!--Hamandcheesemachine (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Michael Machell Britains Got Talent
A tag has been placed on Michael Machell Britains Got Talent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. David (talk) 18:52, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Michael Machell Britains Got Talent
A tag has been placed on Michael Machell Britains Got Talent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rob Banzai (talk) 18:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)