User talk:HamatoKameko/Archive4

Uploading pictures
''You've posted on your talk page more than once, so I know you are aware it exists. As such, I must believe you are also aware that you have accumulated no less than six warnings and negative notices for the month of April alone--and April is only half over! You have also repeated edits after being asked not to without properly discussing the edits on the article talk pages (particularly regarding musical genres), and have repeatedly uploaded images without the proper copyright/licensing/fair use information, even going so far as to upload the same images more than once. ''

''The warnings and notes on your talk page exist for a reason; it is very important that you read them and don't just ignore them. While Wikipedia does encourage its users to Be Bold, you must also be willing to work with other editors to cooperate to improve the site. Many of the edits you've made recently, such as repeatedly changing/adding to genres or uploading images without the required information, border on vandalism--and some can be considered outright vandalism at this point!''

''Please make sure you read both your own talk page and the talk pages of the articles you're interested in editing, as well as the notes embedded in the article coding itself (shown in tags), and please do not ignore your fellow editors. Continuing to do so may ultimately get you blocked from editing entirely. --HamatoKameko (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)''
 * The non-copyrighted pictures were uploaded a long time ago (before I was banned because of this) I was so kite when I uploaded them. Now, I don't upload any pictures. I just wanted you to know. And for others, thank you for your warning. I will be more careful about that.--Nazzzz (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Revert
Please be more careful when reverting. Here you labelled this good faith edit as "vandalism". Seraphim&hearts;  Whipp 14:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're right; the vandalism tag was inadvertent, but unfortunately once you press the button with Twinkle, it doesn't stop until it's done. Nevertheless, I have had very unpleasant run-ins with this individual in the past, and while I would have reverted the edit regardless of who had made it, I admit personal feelings may have swayed the speed at which I did so, rather than pausing to consider and use a regular revert instead.
 * I am, however, curious as to why you found it necessary to bring it up some three weeks after the fact, especially since Xizer, who has been on the site multiple times since the time of my edit, made no complaint to me, and neither the article talk page nor your own show any record of anyone bringing it up, either. --HamatoKameko (talk) 22:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I was checking the recent edits on that article's history and noticed that revert. Because you had made less than 30 edits since then, had continued use of Twinkle, and as you say, no one had made a note of it to you, I thought it worth pointing out. No malice here, it was just a note to be more careful. Seraphim&hearts;   Whipp 22:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)