User talk:HamstersILY/Doomscrolling

Peer Review
The user did not work on the lead and the information he added does not require the lead to be altered.

The user corrected one of the statements of the article, providing accurate and up to date information. The information is correctly cited and is relevant to the topic. The information added is not biased and is written in a neutral tone. The source utilized is the best one available, seeing that it the information has come directly from Merriam-Webster themselves.

The other piece information added is a statistic from a well reputable business intelligence, it is up to date and fits well within the article.

Overall the information added is accurate and is well integrated in the article. The incorrect information was corrected and the statistic added great context.

There is a section of the article which discusses the climate crisis and the effect doomscrolling had on it. I believe that point needs expanding, that could be a good addition. AS DXB (talk) 09:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)