User talk:Hamsuselvam

Welcome!
Hello, Hamsuselvam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister  talk  06:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Gambit (Beyond Nexus)


The article The Gambit (Beyond Nexus) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No better sourcing found to suggest better satisfying books notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  06:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Gambit (Beyond Nexus)


A tag has been placed on The Gambit (Beyond Nexus), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BetaVersa (talk) 06:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The thread is Hamsuselvam. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 08:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Notability for books and writing about yourself
Hi! I thought I'd come and explain why the page was deleted. Ultimately it was because there was nothing to show where the book would pass WP:NBOOK, which is actually fairly difficult to pass on Wikipedia. Passing this would require that the book have received coverage in independent and reliable sources like newspapers. For example, a good source would be something like this review from Booklist or this one from the New York Times. It's usually pretty difficult for self-published and independent books to receive coverage because they release with little to no fanfare and there's just so many of them that the media cannot cover them all, but the coverage is still required.

I also need to warn you about writing about yourself or something that you're affiliated with on Wikipedia. This is discouraged on here because it's just very easy to make something promotional without meaning to or to maybe see more notability then there might actually be. It's also just too easy to take changes or deletion personally. I'll post more information about this in a moment, but I'd like to recommend that you not re-add anything about your book or yourself to Wikipedia. I think that you meant well in this situation, but this book just doesn't meet guidelines at this point in time. Something else I'd recommend is that maybe look into creating something on Wikia. You can do more there and the guidelines there for content are far more loose than they are on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Hamsuselvam. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Prior to "Managing Conflict"
Appreciate your concern. No issues.

File permission problem with File:Book Cover, The Gambit, Sep 2015.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Book Cover, The Gambit, Sep 2015.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)