User talk:Hamza.abboushi

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kaká has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kaká was changed by Hamza.abboushi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873939 on 2013-07-21T01:52:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kaká with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 01:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hamza Ala'aldeen aboushi


The article Hamza Ala'aldeen aboushi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. SL93 (talk) 03:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pepe Reina. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JMHamo (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Xboxandhalo2. Your recent edit to the page Real Madrid C.F. appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Casemiro. TRL (talk) 19:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Real Madrid C.F.. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bobby (talk) 19:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I recommend an unblock. Real Madrid's official website had listed Casemiro as #18 for an extended period, which may have been the source of this user's information.  This seems like an honest mistake conducted in good faith.  Casemiro wore #26 in today's friendly. Bobby (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)