User talk:Han2007

Welcome!
Hello, Han2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! YE  Pacific   Hurricane  18:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

December 2012
Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Batman (1989 film) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite The '45  16:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * What you're editing are Good Articles, and your additions are not deemed helpful by other editors. You may discuss such matters on the talk page, but it is rarely a good idea to go against consensus. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Batman (1989 film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Consider this a warning: attacking other editors (your edit summaries here and ) and incivility  are not tolerated. If you continue to adit in this manner, whether you cease edit warring or not, you can be blocked from editing. - J Greb (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And now you are being willfully disruptive at Mastermind (Jason Wyngarde). Bluntly: Your opinion or interpretation of the films is not a reason to add the material. A reliable, verifiable, secondary source, and preferable a third party one is needed to support that information.
 * If you continue to disrupt the article, re-add that information without an appropriate source, or engage in disruptive actions based on what you want in the article, you will be temporarily blocked from editing.
 * - J Greb (talk) 23:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Last warning. If you are disruptive or edit war as you just did at Batman (1989 film) you will be blocked from editing.
 * Use the article talk pages to show there is consensus for the changes you want.
 * - J Greb (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:J Greb with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, MadGuy7023 (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Mastermind (Jason Wyngarde) does not justify a separate article, much less one that includes your pet theory.

What you did is a disruptive creation of an improper content fork. Please refrain from doing this again.

Similarly, please do not revert redirects to plot only, fanservice character articles and you did here.

And while were at it: - J Greb (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Changes like this need to be explained. Where is that name used? Is it how the character commonly identified?
 * Removing matenace tags, as you did here, without actually addressing the issue is incorrect. Once or twice is disruptive, continuing to do this can be seen as vandalism.
 * Common words and phrases generally should not be linked as you did here. Please read WP:OVERLINK
 * And you are going to need to show a consensus to get this change.
 * Normally this would be a final warning to stop disrupting articles, however:
 * You've been told specifically not to remove maitenance templates, but have done so again -
 * And you are essentially asking to be blocked with your edit summaries here and here.
 * In view of that and you consistent desire to disrupt the article:
 * [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, as you did at Mastermind (Jason Wyngarde). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  J Greb (talk) 11:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Coming off of a block for disrupting articles with your own interpretations and removing maintenance tags without addressing the problems and doing the exact same things - &  - is a good way to get yourself re-blocked.

Please think on this.

- J Greb (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked permanently for a death threat (and a threat of sockpuppetry). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * There is a clear history of anger management issues here. If you've chosen to escalate to specific threats of bodily harm, you are indeed utterly unwelcome to contribute.  At that, I don't see any reason to continue to allow you to post passive-aggressive unblock requests; please use WP:BASC.  Kuru   (talk)  03:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with that, Kuru. This isn't going anywhere. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)