User talk:Han4

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! (→ Netscott ) 00:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Mel Gibson edits reverted
Greetings, I've reverted your category addition on this article because it falls afoul of Wikipedia's biographies of living people policy. Please do not continue to revert as you will likely face blocking in accord with that policy. Thanks. (→ Netscott ) 00:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Little context in Daniel Blaufuks
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Daniel Blaufuks, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Daniel Blaufuks is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Daniel Blaufuks, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Daniel Blaufuks itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for the time being because you appear to be on a rampage of just removing stuff willy-nilly and without bothering to provide even an edit summary to explain your actions. You have one chance to rationalise your recent edits in the light of community consensus and prevailing values. Over to you. -- Rodhull andemu  23:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Right. I've now reverted all your edits. If you want to contribute here, you have to realise that you just cannot delete stuff you disagree with- as you've found out. We work on the basis of constructive discussion, consensus and precedent. If you want to take part in that process, fine, email me and I'll unblock you so you can argue your case. Otherwise, well, that's up to you. If you want to put your own point of view, start your own website. -- Rodhull andemu  23:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Han4! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Daniel Blaufuks -

Proposed deletion of Daniel Blaufuks


The article Daniel Blaufuks has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP. No reliable sources found to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sheep NotGoats  (Talk) 13:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)