User talk:Hanadhul

September 2010
Please don't add templates that aren't accurate. The page has references.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 06:27, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If there is a specific section or something lacking them, please point it out to me.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 06:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur
Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. I recommend that you peruse WP:NLIST. The requirement from a list of people are very clear. Each member requires a source showing that indeed that person is a member of the list. Each member also needs to be notable enough to be included in the text, which is usually established through having an article on the person. See also WP:WTAF. Best regards, and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 07:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I explained the issue politely. What you are doing is against a very clear guideline. If you have a problem with that discuss it in the page's talk page. Continuing to revert against a guideline may be considered vandalism. --Muhandes (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ''Not only do you introduce unsourced material, you remove the maintenance tag. Even if there is some good source somewhere, the article does not specify it.'' Muhandes (talk) 07:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Your edit summaries keep saying "list is referenced". Please peruse WP:V and WP:CITE about what a reference is. NO reference is supplied, and you keep removing the maintenance tags. --Muhandes (talk) 07:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Muhandes (talk) 13:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 14:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * According to your last edit "This page is maintained by government university contributions". --Muhandes (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Muhandes (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)