User talk:Hanche

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Another good link is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics where mathematicians discuss math-related issues on Wikipedia.

Thank you for the Milman–Pettis theorem and Uniformly convex space articles. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Niels Henrik Abel
I've made some changes to the page for Niels Henrik Abel, to which you currently are the lead contributor. I'm neither an Abel expert nor a mathematician, but rather someone interested in the history of mathematics. My guess is that I don't have much more to contribute to Abel's article, other than perhaps some references. If I've made mistakes in my additions then I would appreciate your help in correcting them. Thanks! - Astrochemist (talk) 13:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Einar Haugen
Found another link about the scholarship on another site. --Larrybob (talk) 20:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I wrote too soon - I see that link is already on the page, but I clarified the link title.--Larrybob (talk) 20:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Notes to myself
Oldid to link to specific versions of a page. I can also add #anchor to the page parameter.

Transcendental number
Hi Hanche,

A while ago you removed a citation needed tag I added to this article. My reasoning is as follows... (ignoring 0) all rational numbers are also algebraic numbers (though not nes. the other way round). Therefore rational numbers cannot more closely approximate Liouville numbers (or any number) than algebraic numbers.

This is the text I put the cite needed tag at the end of. "this essentially means that it [a Liouville number] can be more closely approximated by rational numbers than can any algebraic number"

It's not really my area of expertise which is why I tagged rather than rewrote. Is my statement above wrong or is the sentence in the article meant to convey a meaning other than that which I have taken?

IanOfNorwich (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)