User talk:HandThatFeeds

Lexington edit revert
I just added a topic in the Lexington, Kentucky talk page concerning an edit you made. Isaac rowe1 (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the edit you reverted about EFF supporting those harassed by Appin.
You requested secondary sources regarding my edit about the EFF supporting those harassed by Appin. I found them, listed below. If these are okay, let me know, and I'll update the edit, or you can do it yourself.

1. https://www.wired.com/story/appin-training-centers-lawsuits-censorship/

2. https://www.techdirt.com/2024/02/23/maybe-your-lawyers-shouldnt-tell-reporters-you-did-not-engage-in-conspiracy-to-or-complicity-in-murder-when-no-one-was-claiming-otherwise/

3. https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2024/feb/01/global-censorship-appin-reuters/ HARRISONSST (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * None of those are specifically about the EFF's actions, the EFF barely gets a passing mention. That wouldn't work for the paragraph you wanted to add. —  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 15:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * This is a story from Slashdot, which is specifically about the EFF's actions.
 * https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/02/10/0732205/eff-challenges-legal-bullying-of-sites-reporting-on-alleged-appin-hacking-for-hire HARRISONSST (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Slashdot is definitely not a reliable source IMO. It's an aggregator. —  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 15:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * This is not about my paragraph, but I accidentally clicked on a link on the Appin page, and it looks like someone has deliberately messed up the paragraphs and links.
 * Check out -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appin_(company)#cite_note-11
 * Looks like "Biden vs. Haley on abortion" was introduced by the guy below, along with a number of bad edits:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Samuelanderson90 HARRISONSST (talk) 23:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Discuss this on the article's talk page, please. —  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 23:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll do it, but posting on that Talk page just draws unnecessary attention. This is why I post on your page or @Oblivy's page. HARRISONSST (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * the entire point is to draw attention to the problems on the Talk page and work them out there. —  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 23:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

closing discussion on talk page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:September_11_attacks

hello - you closed my talk page discussion as malformed RFC - Its not a RFC just a talk page discussion Gsgdd (talk) 00:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


 * You formed it as an RfC, without following the proper format or process. Therefore I closed it so you can start over. I see you've reverted me. Well, if you're determined to dig a hole, I'm going to offer you an extra shovel. —  The Hand That Feeds You :Bite 00:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * there is lot of discussion already. An id is not generated - i removed rfc tag well before that. so its not a problem Gsgdd (talk) 00:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)