User talk:Handcockshalfhour

Vandalism, pending block
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 16:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

There is no need to delete the information, it is proved to be true in the links at the bottom of the page. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 16:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 16:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I have proved the article is correct, leave it alone. I have removed the things you claim are not correct. Do not vandalise the Encyclopedia, you will be blocked if this carries on. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 18:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! Your dispute with Jack appears to be a difference of opinion rather than actual vandalism, so I wouldn't worry about his warnings.

You should familiarise yourself with the three-revert rule, however - editors are discouraged from reverting the same change more than three times per day, as it's usually a sign of an unproductive edit war. It's better to take it to a talk page (which I see you've now done), wait for another editor to catch it for you, or just take a break and see where the article is a few days later. --McGeddon (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

What I mean about shoot to stop the endangering of property is with the non leathal baton gun which is used in riots to stop property damage, you obviously misunderstood. I hope this wont come between out future editing collegue relationship.Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) 19:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)