User talk:HandySam111


 * Be a little less ridiculous which could start by showing anywhere in many thousands of [|editing actions here] that there has been editing of that article or comment upon the well-known figure who is its subject.HandySam111

3 September 2007
You have been blocked from editing. 123.2.124.42 (your account, your IP address or a range of addresses) was blocked by Yamla for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

Still being used by banned vandal, User:DavidYork71 Your IP address is 123.2.124.42, and your block has been set to expire: 01:40, 13 November 2007. List: User talk:123.2.11.75 User talk:123.2.124.42 User talk:129.78.64.102 User talk:149.135.101.74 User talk:149.135.34.205 User talk:149.135.34.252 User talk:149.135.46.106 User talk:149.135.50.176 User talk:149.135.84.72
 * last usage was June 2007
 * obviously not a vandal. No examples of that on the 'contributions' link at User:DavidYork71
 * list of attributed and suspected accounts shows purposeful contributions from a number of origins (see below List) - not really 'banned' either, when the extent of article construction from those origins/sources/accounts is added into consideration

User talk:203.49.244.253 User talk:220.240.10.83

User:58.163.142.123 User talk:58.163.156.215 User talk:59.101.244.138 That's all. Hope someone with a bit of common sense comes by and reads this. HandySam111
 * if it's all the same i'd prefer not to have to login to update from here anyway, but someone's gone overboard with this '13 November' nonsense. Why don't you put the location on a watchlist of some kind and deal with vandalism and when it actually DOES occur (which hasn't been from me or anyone from the floor above or below here, I could be fairly confident)? It (vandalism) doesn't take long to come to light and get repaired as far as I've seen.