User talk:HangingCurve/Archive 3

Panamanian military
According to several media sources in Panama, when the US invaded Panamá, they didn't came up against the Panamanian Defense Forces, but instead, where here to capture Manuel Noriega which ruled Panama to certainly bad conditions instead of favoring its poor population, he also limited the number of hi class people to him and just a few others. But according to the sources, the invation ended in a tie. With no standing winner.

Since your edits state that "It was no match" in reality... it was, since the US had to use state-of-the-art equipment to invade the country.

201.218.82.97 (talk) 17:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Salting an IP's talk page?
It was a temporary measure meant to last no more than 24 hours. Don't worry, I haven't flipped out that much quite yet :) As for this Mmbabies vandal, it seems that his trolling has attracted a little too much attention. Keeping track of suspected IP ranges is one thing, but labeling every IP used is going too far. I think that the "revert, block, ignore" treatment would provide less incentive for him to continue engaging in bizarre vandalism. Cheers, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 16:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I understand that, even the vandalism from this IP had a creepy and unsavory flavor to it. This vandal may well have some psychiatric problems, as suggested in the WP:LTA page. However, communicating with the creep, or even showing him the least bit of attention, might only encourage him. It's sad that Wikipedia policy has inadequate protocols for dealing with online harassment and his ISP will do nothing to identify the offender; this vandal is breaking several pretty serious real-world laws. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 16:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ktla.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ktla.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wral tv.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wral tv.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. βcommand 22:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Response
Response is on my talk page. :-) - Philippe &#124; Talk 00:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Thank you for making a report at Usernames for administrator attention. Unfortunately, your report has been removed due to the username not violating policy, or not being blatant enough for a block. Please remember you should only post blatant infringements on this page. Others should be discussed with the user in question first, using the Uw-username template. A request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. ''Several usernames you reported really weren't appropriate for WP:UAA. If there's a reasonable argument against blocking, then it's more appropriate to try to talk to the user (using, for example, uw-username) and resort to WP:RFCN if this doesn't allay your concerns or lead to a change in username.'' SamBC(talk) 21:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

A Message By the El-Dude-O'
El-Dude-O' likes your style. El-Dude-O' wants to know if you want to be wikiamigo's - El-Dude-O&#39; (talk) 09:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:So what more do you want to know?
I apologize if my answers weren't clear enough. Maybe it's my journalist's inclination, but I thought getting to the point and expressing my views in a succinct manner was the way to go. If you want to know more, feel free to ask here or on my talk page. Thanks ... Blueboy96 13:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your sincere note. I have now changed my neutral for support because of this message. I also looked through your contributions back 'til June and couldn't find anything to oppose with and I suppose lengthy answers aren't all that important. Good luck. Regards, Rudget .talk 13:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Chucking
''I voted "delete" on that AfD because I got the impression that "chucking" was as common as a balk in baseball ... so it really doesn't happen that often? If that's the case, I may change my vote ... Blueboy96 03:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you actually look at the article you were commenting on? About 25 bowlers have been no balled for throwing in the 130 year history of Test Cricket. Hesperian 04:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Removing that userbox
will change my vote to neutral. Bearian (talk) 23:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. The formatting of the numbers at your RfA is odd.  Fix it? Bearian (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Username report
Thank you for making a report at Usernames for administrator attention. Unfortunately, your report has been removed due to the username not violating policy, or not being blatant enough for a block. Please remember you should only post blatant infringements on this page. Others should be discussed with the user in question first, using the Uw-username template. A request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 05:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

vandalism
The User page I deleted was one of my old ones but I forgot my password. I intend to do the same with another of my old user pages(Manu_kian_maheri93) which I abandoned. Is it possible to destroy the account all together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardeshire Babakan (talk • contribs) 14:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for supporting me! Please find your thank you card here, should you wish to see it. I'm honored to have received your support. Here's to many more good AfDs! :) All the best, ~ Eliz 81 (C)  21:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Unsuccessful nomination
I am sorry to report that your Requests for adminship was unsuccessful (24/17/4). I encourage you to continue your hard work with Wikipedia. Consider the concerns and comments regarding your nomination. It is not unusual for a Wikipedian to become an administrator after multiple unsuccessful attempts. Best of luck, and happy editing! Kingturtle (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. What percentage of the vote do you need to be approved? JTRH (talk) 18:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It's usually around 70 or 75 percent, JTRH. Blueboy, I'm sorry that your nomination wasn't successful; as you saw, I tried to sway people, but since most people just input at an RfA one way or another and then forget it, I don't think my message was seen by many people. I'm pretty disappointed in the opposers, particularly the ones who opposed "per so-and-so" rather than doing any research of their own. Anyway, I hope you'll stick around and keep up all the great work you're doing. Also, you might think about archiving your talk page. ;) GlassCobra 21:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Richard seale AfD
I've removed the afd because that page is a redirect. Feel free to AfD Richard Seale instead. Also, I am not the creator of the article. - Rjd0060 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I understand. I've also speedy tagged Richard seale (the redirect) and I redirected the afd from Articles for deletion/Richard seale to Articles for deletion/Richard Seale.  Not that any of that matters now, since it will be speedy deleted. - Rjd0060 15:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WesternPublicRadioLogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:WesternPublicRadioLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Wendy Venturini
Just curious. Did you know Speed Channel's Wendy Venturini when you were a student at UNC? Chris (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports
Please don't say that a username bears a similarity to the company without citing the company name. It's not particularly convenient to fire up Google every time someone says this... EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 22:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Nancy Johnson
Hey, I had two questions about your recent edit: 1) Do you have a source for the statement that Rowland would have appointed her to the Senate? (I believe it, I'm just wondering where it's from) 2) Is there notability in mentioning that Johnson lost New Britain in particular? She lost there in 2004 as well, for example. Frankg (talk) 06:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Saw the edits you made; they look great. The PBS article was interesting, thanks for digging that up. Frankg (talk) 16:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Cincinnati Public Radio Inc.
I closed this article's AfD after it was re-listed. This needs cleanup and verification with more cites. Public broadcasting corporations are inherently notable. Thank you for bringing this to the community's notice. Bearian (talk) 17:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. We need you to point out the really poor, NN articles. Bearian (talk) 22:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Anaheim Ducks
Until Brian Burke says otherwise, Scott Niedermayer is still suspended. GoodDay (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Banned socks
Thanks for pointing that out. AIV wasn't the best place to report it, and I appreciate your persistence in convincing me to look deeper into it! If you see it again, ping me! Dreadstar †  05:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Report a suspected sock of a banned user to either Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Suspected sock puppets. Read through the top notice tags for uses of Administrator intervention against vandalism.  Can you give me the links to the LTA pages you mention, I'd like to take a look at them to see what they say.  Thanks!  Dreadstar  †  07:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the links. Unless I missed it (and that's entirely possible!), the only that mentions AIV is Long_term_abuse/SummerThunder, and that mention seems to be regarding vandalism rather that reporting a banned sock.  I do know that AIV has a pretty specific use, and banned user or sock reports may be just kicked by an admin, with instructions to take to the suspected sock page or ANI. And, naturally, you can ping me anytime.  Dreadstar  †  00:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Deleting Machine and Wiki Keeping Machine
Don't know and don't much care. :-) Someone has already closed Articles for deletion/Sophie Lancaster as a snowball keep, I can just about give WDM the benefit of the doubt that they didn't want people to think ill of them due to a controversial AfD nomination. WKM, however, that's just flat-out clowning around, so I blocked the account. I doubt it was going to be used again, anyway --Stormie (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

St. Louis Blues (hockey)
Hello Blueboy. Larry Pleau is the Blues only General Manager. If you disagree, I've opened a discusson on the Blues article. GoodDay (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I've requested input from WikiProject Ice Hockey members. GoodDay (talk) 21:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Defender 911
Sorry for taking some time before replying, I went through his contribs (mostly the visible ones, there is not much of interest in the deleted ones) and didn't want to reply before making up my mind. I don't think Defender 911 "got" Wikipedia, as shown in the tremendous amount of time he spent building a paramilitary-like vandal fighting organization, with him as its head. When he learned H had left, he really went berserk, and started his campaign, which only made things worse for H, who left a bit more than a month ago and definitely didn't want that kind of attention. As I said to someone else, this whole story leaves me a sour taste in my mouth because, contrary to most users, Defender did not mean ill when he started to disrupt the project, and was not as disruptive as some other clueless banned users (User:Tweety21 comes instantly to mind). But on the other hand his immaturity made things worse when he was editing, and I wouldn't feel comfortable with him editing (a bit like an elephant in a porcelain store, if you see what I mean). Ok, now the real answer: Personally I don't support nor oppose the ban. I wouldn't have done it, but respect the other editors opinions. He can request a review of the block by the arbcom (off wiki), or you most can do it (on or off wiki), note that it's best if he is the requesting party but I am not aware of any rule preventing an uninvolved editor to ask the arbcom to review it. -- lucasbfr talk 22:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC) `
 * I object to the characterisation that "[I've] been leading the charge against allowing him back", and I am only as "involved" as the other ten admins who endorse the block (excepting Krimpet as blocking administrator, and WJBscribe as largely involved pre-block). I have removed my name from the list of parties, although I still intend to comment — I hope this is OK with you.  Daniel  00:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Salt
Hey. I'm new to AfD and was wanting to get involved. I commented on Articles_for_deletion/Yung_JoJo_Tha_Prince (and somehow forgot to sign) and saw your comment. I was wondering what that term means as I have seen it several times there, but have found no place that explains what it means. Thanks!  Def lag ro   C/T 01:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh okay. Thanks!  Def lag ro   C/T 01:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

LTA
You did an excellent job of summarizing the history of this LTA. I stopped tagging IP addresses for this user a while ago, both because of WP:DENY and because it seemed pointless. I've just been blocking the IPs for a medium period (a couple of days to a week), reverting the changes (which often has meant redirecting and protecting a fork), and avoiding recognition or acknowledgement. I'm glad that several editors are involved in this matter; thanks for your participation. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 08:28, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I Could Use Some Help
I tagged this template with a PROD tag for deletion. Obviously I am doing something wrong. Could you help me out? Take Care and Merry Christmas...NeutralHomer T:C 17:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Scratch that...someone got to it. Thanks...NeutralHomer  T:C 17:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

DY LTA
Thanks :) I'm in a weird situation with that one - I was one of the first two admins on the scene, could immediately recognise an attack on certain pages as a David York one if I saw it, but I didn't actually have much to do with him when he was active and don't actively edit in the areas he rampages in. My original checkuser report and my submission to the community ban proceeding which I think is linked to in some of the documentation, were researched at the time and are probably more useful than anything I can remember now :P Feel free to make use of them for diffs or anything (I don't know how the LTA procedure works so I'll leave that to your judgement). Orderinchaos 02:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Politics in Dade County
I reverted your addition of the Politics section to the Miami-Dade County section because it was unsourced, contained analysis, and was just plain wrong. Dade county elected exclusively Democrats to congressional, state and local offices well into the 1960s, and has never been 'solidly' Republican. Do not mistake Presidential election results for party loyalty. -- Donald Albury 11:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Court-tvold.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Court-tvold.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

John Spano
I appreciate the material you added to this article. Is it all sourced to the Fischler book? If so, I'd appreciate more citations with page numbers. Otherwise, you added a lot of factual material without sourcing it, and this is a BLP article, and much of the material about Spano tends to be negative... Croctotheface (talk) 21:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

WXEL-TV's prior calls
Where did you get your information that WXEL-TV's prior calls were WWPF? According to the TV listings from The Miami Herald from that era, and according to this site, WXEL's prior calls were WHRS-TV. -- azumanga (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Matteau's Goal
Having just watched the tape of Matteau's goal, I have no idea where you think you see Tikkanen's foot in the crease, but it did not get there until after the puck crossed the line. (And that isn't even what the rules say. He is allowed to be there even before that as long as the puck is in the crease as well.)  I am talking frame by frame slow motion and Tikkanen is at least 8 inches away from the crease when the shot is made. And this was from the best possible angle behind the goal. You can clearly see both Matteau's stick shooting the puck and Tikkanen's foot at the same time. And gee...perhaps that is why in 13 years there is not ONE single discussion about this anywhere on the internet or anywhere. You know...because it didn't happen? Could it be that you are a Devil's fan? Bottom line is, that edit has been removed from the Matteau page because it is 100% inaccurate. You might want to learn the rules about being in the crease before editing a Wikipedia page regarding it.

Calgary Flames
Hi Blueboy. The Calgary Flames article is currently nominated as a Featured Article Candidate. If you wish make additions or changes to the article, please make certain that your changes have a valid citation to a source that will support the statement. While we know the comments about the Flames and Oilers having the top records in the conference in the late 80s is true - as an example - without a source that says the same, it simply cannot be added. Thanks, Resolute 19:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Fischler's book
That book is a tongue in cheek book. He was not serious, and having lived around the NY/NJ area and with many Devil's fans nearby (as well as all Devil's games on cable which has NEVER mentioned any controversy), I can say with 100% confidence that Davils fans do NOT think he was in the crease. (A simply google would show ZERO results of there being any discussions about this goal. that ought to tell you something.) Why? For two very big reasons. 1. Replays are not even slightly ambiguous. Tikkanen's skate is at least 18 inches away from the crease and Matteau's stick is already being drawn back. The puck may not be in yet, but it is DEFINITELY in the crease, which means any player can be there as well. And 2.(This one is a big one...) In the 1993-1994 season, there was NO in the crease rule. Or, more accurately, the interpreation of the rule was different. It was not until two seasons later that they changed the rul to penalize a player for being anywhere near the crease. In 1994 the OFFICIAL rule was hat the play in the crease had to be interfering with the play. (As you have edited other hockey articles, you REALLY should learn about the history of the sport before you do anymore. Anyone with even the slightest memory remembers when they changed the interpretation of that rule because in the first seasons after (1996-1997) it nearly ruined the game as goals were getting disallowed for ridiculous reasons.  And anyone editing hockey articles should also know that the rule was officially changed BACK (and replays were no longer allowed for this call) after the infamous Brett Hull goal in the Stanley Cup Finals in 1999.

Let's summarize what you are trying to do. You are claiming that a player broke a rule that DIDN'T exist at the time, even though replays could not possibly be any clearer that even if the rule did exist, he didn't violate them. I will fight you on this. It is 100% inaccurate and you are refering jokes as fact. Have you ever stopped to think that that is why you get turned down for admin status? Reaing your discussions shows that you post a lot of inaccurate stuff and then fight for it. This is one. I will gladly show you screen shots of the goal so you can see for yourself that Tikkanan was so far away from the crease that no one could POSSIBLY argue that he was in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.24.124.159 (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Howard information deleted
Someone recently deleted your contributions to the John Howard article. I started a discussion about this here. Regards,  Lester  09:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Page # citations
I know that you either refer to sources or have sources in mind when you add or modify information in articles. I would really appreciate if you could add citations with page numbers when you do this. It would be very helpful for people who either want to verify your sources or do their own research based on the information in our articles here. Your citations need not be fancy to be effective--if you could put in page numbers however you feel like it, even somewhat sloppily, someone else could go in later and fix them up. Croctotheface (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Donna Edwards birthday
For the Donna Edwards article, you listed her birthday as both June 4 and June 28. Could you clarify and cite? Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 02:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
You have been granted with the rollback permission on the basis of your recent effort on dealing with vandalism. The rollback is a revert tool which can lessens the strains that normal javascripts such as twinkle put on the Wikipedia servers. You will find that you will revert faster through the rollback than through the normal reversion tools such as javascripts and the undo feature, which means that you could save time especially when reverting very large articles such as the George W. Bush page. To use it, simply click the [rollback] (which should appear unbloded if you have twinkle installed) link on the lastest diff page which should appear beside the link to the user's contributions. The rollback link will also appear on the history page beside the edit summary of the lastest edit. For more information, you may refer to this page. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Of hoaxes and deletions
Greetings Blueboy96. LionEV as shown on Wiki is neither a hoax, nor a fraud, nor is it deceptive in any way. All of the links shown, the outside references, and the companion companies are real, valid, and trading with LionEV on a weekly basis. LionEV on Wiki however has received a high number of vandalism attacks. Why, we are not sure. But, the references are there, our product is there in the real world, so what else can we do?

My only thoughts are that there are some out there who wish to raise the issue of credibility for their own gains. Our listing on Wiki has been adjusted to be as educational as possible, without the marketing aspect. Our goal is to promote electric vehicle conversions, whether the process involves LionEV or not. Our official website at LionEV.com shows anyone how this is done, whether they choose to use LionEV products or not. Go there, click on DIY Ranger, see what we are about.

At this point I am at my wits end. Provide me with some guidance. I cannot deal with graffiti on the Wiki page every day.

ElectricOne (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Lucas2506
It has now been taken! Hm, I have no idea how that slipped passed me. Thanks for the heads up. Spellcast (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Patrolling pages and tagging with CSD
Hi there, thanks for your contributions. In case you didn't know, there is a feature called patrolled pages. After you tag an article for speedy deletion, you should mark it as patrolled so other editors don't waste their time re-reviewing it. You should also fill in the Edit Summary so other Recent Changes patrollers know what the edit was about. Entering 'CSD' or 'db-reason' will suffice (replace reason with the appropriate reason). Thanks Shootthedevgru (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Teddy Holland
Thank you, I have reverted Wuggle1974, and have invited him to comment before editing Teddy Holland again. --SyntaxError55 talk 20:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Frankie Falcone
Hi. In putting together Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Blueboy96 3, I noticed that the merger of this article still needs to be done. I'd help you with it but I'm tied up (and spent way too much time on the RfA talk page entry). Can you get together with an admin to take care of this? Thanks, -- A. B. (talk) 14:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * PS: Good luck with your RfA. -- A. B. (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

WPCQ
Rock Hill is easy to forget if you're in Charlotte. :) WIS came in better from ~70 miles away than WPCQ did from 38. FYI, I'm now researching the 1978 affiliation switch - whether WCCB turned down NBC, or the other way around. JTRH (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

tagging format
I formatted the speedy on Susan Hubbard for you. In case it gets deleted before you have a chance to see it, the format for copyvio is You need the hyphen in general after the db in speedy tags, and the part after the bar has to start with url=. given the copyvio, there's no need to worry about whether its an ad--I wouldnt have deleted it as G11, because it could easily have been rewritten without the puffery. DGG (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Confused
The revision to WKPT.. does this mean that I vandalized it? I did not mean to, if I did. Csneed (talk) 02:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Also, just noticed.. someone has vandalized the WCYB article.. the former anchor's name is Merrill Moore, not Merrill Snore--the revision was obviously done by someone who did not like Mr. Moore. I did not change it back, although it does need to be changed. Csneed (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)