User talk:HangingCurve/Archive 8

Another possible KingsOfHearts sock
I attempted to create case number 3, for the suspicious new user His first edits are in defense of Fru23, making similar supportive comments and accusations as his last known attempt,. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

More of this HPJoker
Check here:. I have now been accused of writing comments on my own talk page and "setting up" HPJoker because it didn't take me long to respond. I guess that user doesn't understand that one gets notified whenever there is a new message on his/her talk page. You are also mentioned in this discussion so I figured you might want to take a look. I'm not sure what can be done, but it seems that the individual doesn't really care about Wiki civility or Wiki policies and also doesn't understand rehabilitation prior to being unblocked. Atlantabravz (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Page numbers for Fischler book
I hope you're well. Considering that you seem to have an edition of Cracked Ice that's hard to come by in libraries, I'd really appreciate if you could find page numbers to go along with your citations of the book. I tried to do this myself, but the version of the book that I found did not contain the same information. Croctotheface (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Compuscan
Hello! You just blocked User:Compuscan, as per my UAA report -- thanks. However, you also deleted the article on Compuscan, which this SPA created. I did not ask for that, since Compuscan is a major South African company and there is a great deal of media coverage that verifies this. I was in the process of updating the article when you deleted it. Fortunately, I saved the text offline and I plan to reintroduce the article with proper referencing. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The article is rewritten, with numerous references and no trace of spam. It is actually more of a stub -- it can be expanded in the near future, but right now it serves its purpose. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

RibotBOT
Hello, you just blocked my IP, I probaly missed something, but until now I just created an account intended to be a bot ... there is no edits !!! --Loupeter (talk) 14:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Best wishes for the holiday season


Ecoleetage (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Sim12
Yeah, Elbutler found the IP and AIVed it while I was at Christmas dinner. The IP is blocked for a month, which is good enough for me! Thanks for letting me know, though!!!GJC 04:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Davidwright4hof
Can you block his IP? It's clearly him, as evidenced by being caught in the autoblock recently and the edits, which are a continuation of what DavidWright4hof was doing. Cheers,  Enigma  message 06:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Done, and I also indef'd the main account as well--thanks for the heads-up. Blueboy96 14:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Bambifan
Another sock of Bambifan: User:68.220.175.142. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Usernames
Re: your message here, do we allow recently deceased individuals to edit? They might have access to information we can't verify. ;) Somno (talk) 03:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

re indef block of
Is this an open proxy? I was responding to an AIV report, and was a little taken aback by the sanction length. Cheers, LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool. Have a great New Years Eve and following 2009. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Single Payer Now!
Hi Blueboy,

I want to ask you to reconsider the deletion of Single Payer Now!. I literally was in the process of removing the speedy delete tag when you deleted the article. I'm pretty sure that Singlepayernow is a newbie and had no idea what to do (for example, he thought your block applied to his IP, as you can see on his talk: User talk:216.239.45.4). The group is notable, here is a link to their site where they are hosting a California state senator at a pot luck dinner that was covered by the San Francisco Bay Area's Fox affiliate, KTVU,. And here is a link to the UHCAN.org site (a major site on health care reform), which lists them as one of the universal health care groups in California to contact (their name is listed differently, California Universal Health Care Organizing Project - www.singlepayernow.net, but the web address is identical),. I don't remember if the article had a link to it's homepage (I think it did), but that page shows the state senator with KTVU covering the event, so as per WP:Criteria for speedy deletion "A7 does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source" (bolding is Wikipedia's), I feel it should not have been deleted. Please let me know your decision. Thanks. --Prowler08 (talk) 08:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Sounds good to me and thanks. You can just post it on my talk page. --Prowler08 (talk) 17:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Is posting it on my talk page what you meant when you said that you were willing to send me the text? --Prowler08 (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * No, I don't give out my email. --Prowler08 (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. --Prowler08 (talk) 22:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Paki90
Not sure if you have the talk page of watchlisted, but I would be interested to hear your thoughts on his most recent messages. Speaking as an admin, in the past he has been a total pain in my ass due to his improper image uploads ... however I must admit that after I left him a sternly written final warning, he totally cleaned up his act and virtually all of his images ever since have been on the up-and-up.

Personally, I would be inclined to unblock and give him one last chance if he were to agree to a set of editing restrictions first (such as not adding personal experience/WP:OR to articles, only changing statistics/numbers when he can use WP:CITET to a WP:RS, etc.). That said, he would have to understand that the community's patience is nearly exhausted, and he is but a hair-trigger away from a permanent block. Your opinions? --Kralizec! (talk) 15:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Here is a first-draft of what I was thinking of:


 * Paki90, I am prepared to unblock your account if you agree to six months of probation under the following editing restriction:
 * Except for cases of blatant vandalism (such as page blanking or inserting profanity/random characters into articles), you will not revert any article more than one time in a 24-hour period.
 * You will not add info to, or change an article to reflect your own personal experiences or any other form of prohibited original research.
 * You will not change any number or statistic without using citation templates to properly source the information to a reliable, third-party, published source.
 * You recognize that the Wikipedia community's patience is nearly exhausted, and any violation of this probation will result in an immediate and permanent block of your account.
 * Do you agree to these terms, Paki90 ?
 * What do you think? Are there any changes or additions you can think of?  --Kralizec! (talk) 17:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Just us? --Kralizec! (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Done! You are probably right about the ban; lets hope this is enough to set him on the straight-and-narrow path.  --Kralizec! (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Not sure if you had seen this yet, but I was wondering as to your thoughts on the issue. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi - could you take a look at that unblock request? Best,  Sandstein   07:51, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

re: AfD tag
"Note to nom--be sure to add the AfD tag next time." - I do this with a tool (I don't know which is what that does this) and at the time I was doing this, something was happening with the database (it wasn't updating properly) and I couldn't tell what was done and what wasn't. I had to keep reloading the creator's talk page to see if the notice had been posted there. It took about 10 minutes for it to appear. Sorry! Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ona Zee
Nope, an old "friend" had some fun there. I was stuck when purging the history because I didn't want to accidentally restore what you deleted. Hence the mess :) -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 14:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

about bot
hi, i am new in the bots.. i make a new bot trBot but i see it blocked.. :( i want to start but it blocked. what i do now?! regards --TRD (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Njnlogo.gif)
You've uploaded File:Njnlogo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Nice job!
Well done on re-wording the article Death penalty (NCAA) and the section on MacMurray college. I found the information and just knew that it was significant and should be added, but just somehow couldn't write a single sentence worth anything. You picked up the ball and carried it very well.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:SHPTV.gif)
You've uploaded File:SHPTV.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged Revs
Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template  « l | Ψrometheăn ™ | l »   (talk) 06:53, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Connorfreakyfree
Yes, I saw. good call. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 20:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Invitation
I've noticed you've made some really good edits to History of the Philadelphia Phillies, and I could really use some help getting Phillies articles up to par (that one especially, since I'm trying to get it as the lead article in a featured topic). Thus, I extend to you, my fellow fan, an invitation. I hope you accept. KV5 •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  02:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Be Black Hole Sun - The sockmaster
I just blocked the Norwegian account for User:We Will Rise Again on no.wiki as a sockpuppet of User:Be Black Hole Sun. You should of course judge for your self, but I just wanted to make you aware of the account. Best wishes. 3s (talk) 13:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

User:History'ee
Thanks for correcting my spelling on the AIV noticeboard and for following up. I believe that this is the third time the article on the elusive Mr. Tucker has appeared under slightly different names! Is AIV the right place to report things like this in future? pablo hablo. 06:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure it's three times. I don't have it on my watchlist any more, although you may find it under deleted contribs for User:Proysen6 (if that was the account he used!) pablo hablo. 13:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Pass the salt
Cornography is now in its fourth incarnation pablo hablo. 19:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

College Fight Songs
There is a thread on the administrators' noticeboard which may concern you. Please see Administrators'_noticeboard. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Edwards Rail Car Company, coi, more help needed
Yesterday, I reported, for being a promotional username, and most, if not all, of his edits were subsequently reverted after he was blocked by you.

Going through some edit histories today, I discovered had earlier been acting as a SPA, editing, creating  (Successor company to Edwards) and adding various internal and external links for EIKON, as well as their products (see picture of orange railcar at ). I would strongly suspect these 2 accounts are the same person.

also appears to have been involved as another similar SPA, a few days before Stokermatic.

On a few of the articles edit history's, appears to have given assistance, but his edit history shows many good faith edits. Could be just a coincidence, but it's hard to say for sure.

I have altered most of the external links for EIKON to internal links for EIKON International, but I would hesitate to try removing all of the content the "Stoker Brothers" have inserted, as I may do more harm than good. Any Expert/Administrative assistance you can offer in straightening this suspected COI (and possibly sockpuppet as well) mess would be greatly appreciated. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:KNSD.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:KNSD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Tissa Abeysekara
Dear friend, I want to Create an Article Person who Name Tissa Abeysekara. May i know was it delete previously?. Because i saw one message relate to deletion.What is the way recreate this page? (Jets (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC))

Thanks!
I'm a little leery of unblocking the guy, but I like to assume good faith. I'll go ahead and unblock him on the assumption he wants to contribute meaningfully. Thanks for the heads-up. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Request Block
Seeing how you blocked the user DJMASACRE for vandalism on the page Rideau High School, can you also block his or her sock puppet account Shopgirl15 as well? The amount of vandalism being reverted is excessive. Thank you. - Io Katai (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:KCNC.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:KCNC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Charles Ponzi
I did not "unnecessarily change date formats", I delinked dates, added a birth date template and did another minor clean-up on the page. If you don't agree with the date formatting that was made in the course of doing so, that is one thing. It's another to leave a canned "welcome - don't change date formatting" message to me without recognizing that the edits were different than that to which the canned message refers. I'd suggest a bit less script messaging and a bit more attention to what was done. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

UAA concern
Hi, we're both regulars at UAA (you moreso), so I though I would consult you. I was patrolling through the username creation log when I found. I'm worried it might be a similar name to the MyPasswordis accounts. Any input?  Ceran  thor 14:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Xstructure links
In regard to the ANI discussion, the following users were also adding links with no other activity Wireader (talk · contribs), Baxxterr (talk · contribs) 82.142.132.74 (talk · contribs). I provided some diffs at ANI --Enric Naval (talk) 21:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

WCNC
Thanks for fixing it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.10.174.148 (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Userfication request
Please userfy Ernest M. Edsel and Malpaso Company to my userspace. I've become involved in an issue indirectly related to them and I would like to see what these articles looked like before deletion. Thank you. KuyaBriBri Talk 17:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Trolling
I don't know what trolling is? This user is the first to complain about other peoples' usernames, and I think that he himself violates the policy.Racingstripes (talk) 15:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What have I done that is disruptive? So far all I have done is create a constructive article that has gotten positive feed back.  My usernames were, in my opinion, humurous but someone feels that they were offensive.  I think I should be given an explanation why they are offensive.  I also would like an explanation of such a lack of expanations.  I have been civil, constructive, and I feel that I have gone through the appropriate means, channels, and appeals to get an explanation but no one wants to give me one.  And now I feel like I am being given a gag order.Racingstripes (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

hoaxer
I noticed that User:Bottlepop123 cited the PJK Charts as the only chart his made up band charted on. The article on those charts was deleted as a hoax as well, but as a non-admin I can't see who created it. I'm wondering if we've got a serial hoaxer and sock puppeteer on out hands here. By the way, thanks for closing the TfD, I tried to make it a speedy but the tag had extra requirements that did not apply, even though it was obviously part of the hoax. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm ... PJK Charts was speedied back in January--and yet a new account knows about it already? I agree, that does look suspicious.  I'm gonna go through the deletion log and open a sock investigation to get some other eyes on it. Blueboy96 03:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Common Ground Productions
Hope you don't mind. I've unblocked this user to allow them to get their name changed, per an email I received. --Dweller (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Your warning about inappropriate links
Blueboy96, You recently left me a warning about "inappropriate links" on my talk page, specifically my adding of references to www.Wikifonia.org for a number of songs. I wrote a note to Xeno regarding this and am posting some of that same content here to you in order to seek your feedback and a better understanding of why you are objecting so strenuously to my postings.

I am not affiliated with the Wikifonia project and have nothing personal to gain by posting links to their web site. I am a frequent user and contributor to Wikifonia and decided to add references to their site strictly for what are, to me, well-intended reasons. However, before adding any links, I did inform the two principal designers and maintainers of Wikifonia of my intentions. They informed me, as they had done in the past, that sheet music which is presented and distributed by Wikifonia is legitimate and legal. All of the original copyright holders of the music are properly compensated through their foundation if a user decides to view or download a personal copy of the music.

It should be noted that the form of the sheet music that Wikifonia presents are lead sheets. These are NOT arrangements of the song, but are in a form that is consistent with how a song is submitted for copyright. In other words, the lead sheet is not subject to claims of artistic interpretation and represents a transcription of the music that unambiguously identifies it with the original composer(s) and/or lyricist(s). Wikifonia is a Wiki, and as such, anyone can contribute and/or make corrections to the lead sheets on this site.

Wikipedia has hundreds of articles about songs, but I have been frustrated that the vast majority of these articles focus on recordings and artistic interpretations of this music, and not on the music itself or musicological analysis. It seems to me that a reference to a copy of the original sheet music would be extremely helpful to many readers of these articles. As a practicing amateur musician, it certainly would be of interest to me.

Why, for example is it acceptable for there to be hundreds of links, many of them external links to publishers of recordings of a song, but it is not acceptable to have a link to the sheet music representing that song? It would seem to me that nothing could be more appropriate as an external reference or link than a link to the sheet music that represents this song. What better reference for learned analysis or recreational understanding of a piece of music?

I have noticed dozens, even hundreds of references to www.jazzstandards.com throughout Wikipedia. Jazzstandards.com is an external commercial site. It is an outstanding reference for historical and musicological analysis of songs, but it sells and advertises recordings and books as well. How is a reference to Wikifonia different from one for Jazzstandards.com?

Would it make a difference, from your perspective, if the link were added in a different form or context? Most articles on songs contain a large section entitled "Notable Recordings". What about the possibility of including a section entitled "Notable transcriptions"? How about a properly referenced "External link" entry? If an article about a song contained a section which consisted of musicological analysis of the song, would it then be acceptable to reference the sheet music for the song in the "references" section?

I would very much appreciate your helping me to better understand the specific issues and concerns that led to you objecting so strenuously to my postings. It is not my intent to SPAM, to unduly or unfairly promote a commercial entity, or violate the guidelines of Wikipedia. However, your opposition to my edits, and in particular, going so far as to threaten to block me from editing Wikipedia seem misplaced and overreaching. I welcome your feedback.

Thank you,

EulerOperator EulerOperator (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Blueboy96,

At the suggestion of Xeno, I have reviewed the guidelines for WT:SONGS. The recommended guideline at the following location WT:SONGS (sorry, can't seem to make this link work) specifically indicates that external links to sheet music and tabs can/may be included in the External References section of an article which falls under this category.

Given this guideline, do you have any further objections to my including an external reference to a lead sheet on Wikiphonia? I have examined other song articles with external and these would seem to be consistent. There is clearly the concern about copyright infringement which WT:SONGS references for lyrics in particular. In the case of lead sheets on Wikiphonia, copyrights are fully protected. See: http://www.wikifonia.org/legal/copyright.

Thank you,

EulerOperator EulerOperator (talk) 04:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Photos
how do you put photos on your talk page? Sourlemonade (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

undo
Please undo this, it is overzealous and is likely to drive off an editor who appears to be acting in good faith. He has had little chance to respond. cygnis insignis 03:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Please respond to this, it is impolite to ignore my post. cygnis insignis 05:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

[Copied from my talk] ''I would have been inclined to simply ask him to engage the community, but when I found out he'd been warned before, I thought leniency wasn't possible. I take a very hard line on copyright issues. Blueboy96 05:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)''


 * Leniency? The user is not online, his contributions show he was attempting to fix the problem. My brief interaction of the user has left me with the impression that he makes mistakes, but is willing to correct them. How is this block protecting our document, and where is your evidence? How is this not a punitive block? cygnis insignis 06:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

''On second thought, I forgot he's probably still in bed and hasn't had time to respond. I've unblocked, but with a request to respond as quickly as possible at ANI. Blueboy96 06:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)''


 * Or he has a life beyond wikipedia. Thanks for reconsidering your action. cygnis insignis 06:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

madoff
you are making a mess of this. it is out of sequence and the syntax and grammar are very mediocre. don't you want assistence or is all about your pov and chronology? this is not an opinion piece. Your writing skills are very inadequate, sorry.

Furtive admirer (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Possible return of blocked sockpuppeteer
User Rebelprince started editing 4 days after Tylerwade123 was indefinitely blocked by you. Though Rebelprince has remained civil and avoided edit warring, his talk page and edit history show he has common interests with Tylerwade123. Of more concern, Rebelprince has recently created a new category and started spamming it across some of the same articles Tylerwade has shown an interest in and added a talk page comment that engages in heavy praise of Tylerwade123. Edward321 (talk) 05:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Rebelprince has also re-added the same list of categories (plus his new category) that Tylerwade admitted he had repeatedly tried to add to the  Lelouch_Lamperouge article. Edward321 (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As per your advice, I added a SPI of Rebel Prince. Edward321 (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Just FYI, Rebelprince has just further proved he is a sock of Tylerwade123 on his talk page, since that IP is an admitted sock of Tylerwade123. Edward321 (talk) 04:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

"Affiliate"
Re your designation of WBTV as CBS's second-longest-tenured affiliate: By "affiliate," do you specifically mean a station not owned by the network? Because several of the CBS O&O's (WCBS, WBBM, KPIX for starters) have broadcast CBS programming longer than WBTV or WUSA. Thanks. 166.204.22.12 (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification.166.204.22.12 (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Hkelkar
Hi Blueboy96, please see the following edits by 70.112.4.25 and blocked 72.179.43.74. Both IPs: Austin, Texas, or banned user Hkelkar. See this. Beanmore (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * User:Beanmore is the sock puppet of banned user User:Baron.atreid70.112.4.25 (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

hi


AgentSpy101 (talk) has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Hi Blueboy
Hi there Blueboy. I was blocking 86.162.67.18 and 70.112.4.25 for edit warring at [State terrorism] when I found that you had blocked 70.112.4.25 a week ago for being a sock of Hkelkar. Is that their IP range or what? How did you know? Thanks in advance. --  FayssalF   - Wiki me up® 19:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. Got it. Thanks. --  FayssalF   - Wiki me up® 20:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Juvenile Deletionist redux?
I think he may have taken another out of the drawer; can you check User:Bildstit? Same pattern except he hasn't created mass AfD's, he's only created one as his first contrib and then went on to vote up the line on most of today's list, with many of them under delete votes.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 09:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * He turned out to be a ManSam sock, so he's gone. The patterns were incredibly similar, though.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Girls Aloud discography
Why have you blocked me fro mediting Girls Aloud discography? because I, from England know the chart placings for them and I cannot add them so can you please make me able to edit it again as it was only an accident, I was ment to press "Show Preview" but I accidently pressed "Save Page". Thank you from Theog101 (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC).