User talk:Hanin.idris

November 2022
Hi Hanin.idris! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Halmurat Upur that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Fun Is Optional (talk) 09:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mako001. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Peter Tertzakian because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 07:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
 Hi Hanin.idris! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Ken Gallager (talk) 14:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Hanin.idris! Your additions to Fire accelerant have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Phillip Kingston
Hi there! This is just a quick note to let you know that I've reverted your recent edits at Phillip Kingston. I did this because the text you added seemed to be copied from the source given and because having a section on Galactic Bioware may give it undue weight. As has been mentioned above, Wikipedia has to paraphrase the sources used in order to avoid copyright violations; please do take note of this as it will mean less of your edits will have to be reverted.

I've also looked for some more independent sources for the information about Galactic Bioware but I couldn't easily find any. Because notability is shown through published, reliable sources, this suggests that having a section on it may lend the article a non-neutral point of view.

Hopefully this explains why I've removed your edit, but if you have any questions just reply here and I'll do my best to answer. Thanks, Gazamp (talk) 20:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * These are the sources
 * https://aaicogroup.slack.com/files/U03BGNXDY9G/F052E2HJ44T/link_touts_pexa_stake_after_price_scares_bidder.pdf
 * https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/link-touts-pexa-stake-after-price-scares-bidder/news-story/ea25d07a25727af2ca1fe0b36ed57a03
 * https://www.businessnews.com.au/Person/Phillip-Kingston
 * Please revert it back and i will further edit and cite it. Hanin.idris (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * So the first source is a Slack link which doesn't seem to be accessible; in any case it seems to be from AAICO which would mean it isn't an independent source. It also has the same string in its URL to the second so I suspect that it's a similar if not identical article. The Australian has a paywall up which means I can't check the entire article, but the headline seems to be completely unconnected (let me know if I'm wrong) and so I expect that it's just a passing mention. This might be able to support something on Galactic, depending on quite how small the mention is, but to be honest I doubt it. The last link is a profile and it seems to me to be written by Kingston or on his behalf so I don't think it would be independent enough to balance a whole section on Galactic on; for this reason I'm also going to take it out of the article where you added it yesterday.


 * I think it might be worth reflecting on how relevant Galactic is to the article at the moment - when Kingston is talked about in independent sources, it's rare that Galactic is even mentioned. This article which is all about him, for example, has about a dozen words on Galactic and doesn't even mention it by name. Not to say it won't ever be in the article, but at the moment there just doesn't seem to be enough coverage to warrant it. Thanks, Gazamp (talk) 02:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)