User talk:Hankwang/Archive 2014-

Conversion unit between energyPAR and photon PAR 3000K (warm white) LED
Dear Hankwang. At Photosynthetically active radiation page in wiki, I saw you edited the LED with 3000k warm white can convert the energy PAR to the photon PAR multiply by 4.98. Could you send me a link of concerned paper or documents relate to this issue? Which could show the 3000K warm white unit converted by the 4.98 µmol s-1W*-1 I am looking forward for that papers or documents as necessary for research working. Thank you so much! Sincerely Fan Zhangfan0612 (talk) 11:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I will respond to this on Talk:Photosynthetically active radiation. Han-Kwang (t) 12:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the hard drive capacity over time graph.
HI Han-Kwang Nienhuys- Would like to discuss your hard drive capacity over time graphic. It looks accurate to me based on mass market / retail availability. Interested in using it in a computer history book. Would like to chat. Please email me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.127.173.180 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Responded by email. Han-Kwang (t) 14:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Capital Group Companies's ownership
Instead of reverting the edits, how about changing "parent" into "owner", would that seem better? Seqqis (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * IMO still misleading to announce a 8% shareholder as "owner". At what percentage do you put the cut-off? In the case of ASML, which caught my attention, the value of 8.8% is outdated anyway. Morningstar report (see under "Equity ownership", "Institutions" tab). I think Intel/Samsung/TSMC own some 25% of non-voting ASML shares; shouldn't those be listed as well? Moreover, from a practical point of view: you would have to list many large shareholders for each and every company, and update this information all the time. Better leave that to organizations that have a real-time data feed. Other example: Royal Dutch Shell on Morningstar: very different numbers from the 9.85% that you added to the article. Han-Kwang (t) 15:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, I will delete the edits I did when I get to them. However leaving the "owner(s)" or "parent" sections in the info boxes empty doesn't seem acceptable even though the company or companies do own some percentage of another company.Seqqis (talk) 22:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Huh? If you don't assign a value in the macro, then it doesn't show up in the infobox. If the company is publicly traded (as indicated under "Type"), then there is no well-defined owner or parent, unless at the IPO the original founders kept a substantial part of the shares. If an entity buys enough shares to appoint members of the board of management, then they have to make a tender offer to take over the rest of the company as well, so the distinction between one of the many shareholders and "owner" or "parent" is usually quite clear. Han-Kwang (t) 07:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox nutritional value
Template:Infobox nutritional value has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ego White Tray (talk) 22:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Carolina Reaper
Your edit on the Carolina Reaper is incorrect. The only mention of the Trinidad Scorpion in the article  is as follows: "Like most businesses on the rise, there's healthy competition. Shortly after the Ghost Pepper from India became the world's hottest pepper, native Australian pepper the Butch T Scorpion topped it. That's why Currie is paying a pretty penny for the right to be called the hottest pepper in the world."

As you can see, the chile referenced is the Butch T Scorpion not the Moruga Scorpion.

JamesWreck (talk) 21:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, I reverted my edit, for now. By 'referenced article', I meant the Butch T Scorpion article, which stated that it was dethroned by the Trinidad Moruga Scorpion, although not in the Guinness book. Han-Kwang (t) 19:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nutrition template
Hello, please check the talk page, here. Your technical expertise would be very helpful there. Thanks. HempFan (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Worcestershire sauce.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Worcestershire sauce.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:47, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:EUV phase defect scatter.png


The file File:EUV phase defect scatter.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Resolution vs. DOF.png


The file File:Resolution vs. DOF.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)