User talk:HannahBeth01

Welcome!
Hello, HannahBeth01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quis separabit? 00:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paranormal City
Hello HannahBeth01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Paranormal City for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. — swpb T 20:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Your recent edit to December 13 appears to have added the name of a non-notable individual or event to a list that includes only sufficiently globally notable entries. A person or event added to a notability list must have, minimally, a pre-existing article. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines, although more stringent criteria are being implemented, based on global notability. Quis separabit? 00:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Signs cover1.png
Thanks for uploading File:Signs cover1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Mark ryan 3.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mark ryan 3.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Kevlin Ryan


The article Mark Kevlin Ryan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paranormal City, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 02:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Kevlin Ryan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Kevlin Ryan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Kevlin Ryan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 02:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Paranormal City for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paranormal City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paranormal City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mark Kevlin Ryan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paranormal City, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Paranormal City. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Working with other editors
Hello. It's clear that you have strong feelings regarding the artiste Paranormal City, but your continual efforts to revert edits made by other Wikipedians are causing conflict between you and others. The issue is that the artiste doesn't appear to have made enough impact to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, which you can read at Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. In addition, it would appear that when creating the pages for him and for his song, Signs (Paranormal City song), you included information which was incorrect, such as international sales and chart positions. Whether you did this unintentionally or knowing that the information was false, adding this sort of untrue claim makes other editors suspicious of all your edits. You also used sources such as Facebook and YouTube to support claims made in the articles on Wikipedia, these are not considered to be reliable. The guidelines at Identifying reliable sources#Questionable and self-published sources explain why.

The reason your account was blocked was that you repeatedly reverted other people's edits without discussing the issues: again, this makes others suspect that you are not interested in reaching a consensus with other editors. It may benefit you to read Here to build an encyclopedia#Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia.

As you are already aware, the pages you have created are currently being discussed by editors, to decide whether their subjects are currently notable enough to warrant their own Wikipedia pages: you can find the guidelines for contributing to these discussions at Articles for deletion#How to contribute. There is also a useful guide, So your article has been nominated for deletion. If you feel that there are valid reasons to keep either of the articles on Wikipedia, the best way to contribute is by joining in with the discussions: if you simply revert edits or delete the notices on article pages, you risk having your account permanently blocked.

Please feel free to add messages below this, if you have any questions or need some help: I'll keep an eye on this page over the next few days and respond if necessary. Regards, ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Mark Kelvin Ryan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Stop recreating this page, you've been warned several times. '' CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 12:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)