User talk:HannahSharpe

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saint-Martin-sur-Armançon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saint-Martin-sur-Armançon was changed by HannahSharpe (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-05T03:02:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

User Page looks fine. You are off to a good start. Well --- other than the vandalism warning!!! How did you end up blanking that page? --JimmyButler (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Experimenting with the "random article" link? :) Tim Vickers (talk) 02:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Not a problem, everything you do here is reversible so you can't break anything. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Encylopedia
Cingulum (anatomy) Do you feel that the addition of the complete abstract from an article in the PubMed data base, contributed to the understanding of that particular topic in a meaningful way?

Please consider the following guidelines:
 * Do not include copies of primary sources


 * Perhaps consider this guideline when introducing information as well:

''Scientific journals and Research papers. A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the lead and initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While wikilinks should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.''

I would revert the page back to the original stub and consider just adding a citation to the article you are working on. --JimmyButler (talk) 00:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello
I saw that your class was looking for mentors for your project, so I went ahead and signed up. I think it's a great idea that you are writing a biology paper and at the same time creating an article that will be useful to people around the world. If you have any questions about writing, referencing sources, reviews, or article formatting, don't hesitate to post a message on my talk page. Anything that I think can be improved in your article will be noted on the article talk page. My wife knows a lot more than I do about birth issues; I will see if I can get her advice as well. I'm looking forward to working with you to get your article promoted to GA or maybe even FA. Wronkiew (talk) 05:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)