User talk:HannahVeraBanks

Welcome!

Hello, HannahVeraBanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Len Steckler, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bihco (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Len Steckler


A tag has been placed on Len Steckler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bihco (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Len Steckler
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Len Steckler, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://lensteckler.com/Biography.aspx. As a copyright violation, Len Steckler appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Len Steckler has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Len Steckler and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Len Steckler with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Len Steckler.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Visit Series


A tag has been placed on The Visit Series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Len Steckler


A tag has been placed on Len Steckler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 00:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Len Steckler
I deleted your recent article because it had numerous problems
 * It was substantially copied from here, which does not state that its text is public domain, so is assumed to be copyright. In fact it is tagged © Len Steckler 2010
 * If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article talk page.
 * Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at the article talk page with a link to the web page details.
 * Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at the article talk page saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.


 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent references. There were no independent references; indeed even the partisan site you copied from wasn't acknowledged


 * Even if the text had not been copyright, it still wasn't a neutral encyclopaedia article, it was pure spam, with lots of unsourced spammy claims.  Currently in his 80’s Steckler is still providing the art world with photographs and paintings and he intends to do so just as long as there is a world that is still turning full of beautiful subjects still waiting to be discovered. What has that got to do with an encyclopaedia?


 * Please ask your colleague not to remove speedy deletion notices, bad faith edits will be reverted.

The Visit

 * Copied from here clearly marked as copyright, see above for what to do.


 * Again, no neutral sources. Although you give two links, one is just a commercial sales site, the other is an interview with Steckler, hardly an independent source


 * Did you read what you copied? The whole style, especially the first para of The Images is spammy purple prose, with no place in an encyclopaedia &mdash; The images are candid, the smiles and touches between the two subjects are very real. If it were not for the artistic eye of Steckler they may have just appeared as simple snap shots. But the two stars are in full focus and each touching moment between them captured with tender hands... (yuk)


 * Then we get to the sales pitch &mdash; for the public to see and to own... Eagle National Mint and they continue to be the only authorized dealer for the collection... Visit Series images provided by Eagle National Mint


 * Please ask your colleague not to remove speedy deletion notices, bad faith edits will be reverted.

This is just not acceptable  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)