User talk:Hannah Hunter

Rettighetsregisteret.no
A tag has been placed on Rettighetsregisteret.no, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mjroots (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Mjroots (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rettighetsregisteret
A tag has been placed on Rettighetsregisteret requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lankiveil (complaints 14:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletions
Hello,

I notice that you've created a few articles that have been nominated for deletion. Just so you know, I thought I might point you towards the relevant notability guidelines. If the subject of an article does not meet these guidelines, then their articles are likely to be deleted.


 * With regards to Rettighetsregisteret‎, WP:WEB is the relevant guideline.
 * With regards to Hobbart & Hobbart‎, you should look at WP:CORP.

I'm sorry to say, based upon my appraisal of the articles, they are unlikely to meet the guidelines in their current state. You should include evidence of notability, supported by reliable sources to show how these sites and companies meet the guidelines.

If you've any questions, please feel free to leave them on my talk page. Lankiveil (complaints 14:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC).

Nomination of Hobbart & Hobbart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hobbart & Hobbart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hobbart & Hobbart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MER-C 13:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)