User talk:Hannahruthc

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth's rule
A tag has been placed on Elizabeth's rule, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Half Shadow  21:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Elizabeth's rule has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --RrburkeekrubrR 22:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

advice
As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article, because it is not really suitable for Wikipedia--which is after all an encyclopedia, not a social networking site. But I have sent you an email.