User talk:HannesP

Speedy deletion nomination of Quilty (folk band)


A tag has been placed on Quilty (folk band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 10:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. When you recently edited Pilaf, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Persian and Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy
Hi HannesP, welcome to the CVUA. I'll be your instructor if you have no objections. You will be my first student so if you think of anything which I could do differently or better please leave a note in the feedback section (keep reading).

Regarding the counter-vandalism tools, I use a combination of WP:TWINKLE, WP:HUGGLE and WP:STiki - but we can talk about this more later on.

I have created (with some help) a number of lessons which I will give to you throughout our time together. Firstly would you please have a read through User:Callanecc/CVUA (there is also a link to it on my userpage), this is page which I will base all of my students on so it contains some nice general information. All of your lessons will be given through your Academy page which you can access through my CVUA page and with this link: User:Callanecc/CVUA/HannesP.

If you have any questions or comments please feel free to leave them on my talk page. I hope you enjoy your time in the Academy and get something worth while out of it. I won't be around much in the next few days, but I have left a few tasks for you to do in the mean time :). Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 13:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I realise that the above was a lot of information to digest, but you have a few days to read through and start with the tasks. Any questions or comments, please leave a comment on my talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 08:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Are you still interested in continuing with the CVUA. If so, would you please start working through the question at User:Callanecc/CVUA/HannesP. If not, would you please reply to this message so I know what to do next. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello! I'm still interested, but I have a lot of work right now so I'd be thankful if it could be postponed for a week or so. Thanks in advance ✎ HannesP · talk 21:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Yep no worries, your Academy page is still at User:Callanecc/CVUA/HannesP so when you get back feel free to start up again. If you could leave a message on my talk page, when you are ready to start again, that would be great. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I've removed your name from the list, if you want to rejoin the academy, please add a new request on WP:CVUA/E. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)