User talk:HansDieterUlrich

Speedy deletion nomination of Act III Communications


A tag has been placed on Act III Communications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.concordmusicgroup.com/news/concord-music-group-village-roadshow-pictures-and-act-iii-communications/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Freshh! (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Hans, I spent a little while editing the article to try to rewrite around direct copyvio. You should do the same to save your article.  Look at this link to find the offending copy (which you might have posted originally.  Additional research will also show you some better, more detailed statements of the facts involved, rather than stealing someone else's writing, which is a wikipedia copyright violation. Trackinfo (talk) 07:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Act III Theatres (November 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Act III Theatres and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:HansDieterUlrich Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rankersbo&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:HansDieterUlrich reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 08:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harvard University Shields
Hello HansDieterUlrich,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Harvard University Shields for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 02:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Vinton Freedley
 * added links pointing to George and Ira Gershwin, Lady, Be Good!, Jackpot, Elsie, Ray Brown, Hold Everything, Heads Up!, Mister Roberts, Hasty Pudding and The World We Live In

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Porcellian and talk page comments
Hi there. I responded to your comments on the Porcellian Club's talk page, but I didn't want you to be confused about where to find my response. On talk pages here, new comments go at the bottom of the talk page, not the top. Thus, I moved your comments to the bottom of the page, put them in order by date, and then responded below the one you added today. If you'll follow that principle, too, it'll help all of us follow along with conversations more easily. Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 22:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation.HansDieterUlrich (talk) 14:41, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Understanding media usage on Wikipedia
Well, you're really going to hate me now. So, I went to the Harvard University Shields article that you created and removed links to all of the images you uploaded. I also nominated all of those images for deletion on Wikimedia Commons. Wikipedia has pretty well defined policies about how we can use what we call "non-free content". Free in this context means "free of restrictions", not "free of charge". In general, articles only display images that are free of restrictions, meaning the image is in the public domain, its copyright has been released, or it's been released under a so-called free license. The limited use of non-free images is permitted under very strict rules, found here. In general, non-free images can't be used purely for decorative purposes, which is all they were being used for in the shields article.

Now, on to Wikimedia Commons. When you uploaded those images to Wikimedia Commons, you certified that you own the copyright to them. It's right there in the language on the image's page: "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:". But it's a pretty sure bet on my part that you don't own the copyright to them--Harvard does. Harvard is the only one, then, who can choose to release those images under any license or under no license at all. Commons only hosts free images, and those images aren't free. Just because you can find them for free on the internet doesn't mean they're yours to use however you want, or ours here at Wikipedia to use however we want. Please read up on the image polices before adding anything else. Esrever (klaT) 22:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

I am confused about this point, but until I learn the rules a better I won;t upload. I saw that similar images were being used for other Universities with similar attribution. I created the images myself, but I suppose the point you are making is that the underlying copyright may still be with the University which I get. The ones over 95 years old are definitely in the public domain. It would seem under the usage policies that you can just designate them as public domain, which seems to be what happens with the ones I saw for other Universities. Do you know if there is some other reference required for a PD designation?

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Porcellian Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Barry & Fran Weissler. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  03:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Robert Whitehead (theatre producer)
 * added links pointing to The Changeling, Bus Stop, Foxy, Mr. Big, After The Fall, Golden Boy, The Price, The Sleeping Prince, Lillian, Broken Glass, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie and The Speed of Darkness


 * Barry & Fran Weissler
 * added links pointing to Grease, Pippin, Violet, Zorba, Annie Get Your Gun, Promises, Promises, La Cage aux Folles and Gypsy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Harvard University Shields for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harvard University Shields is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harvard University Shields until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 17:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)