User talk:Hans Engstrom

You have been spamming lots of arricles with the following boxes

Most of those articles do not have any discussions at all, thus your claim that facts have been disputed are false. If you have any claims or facts, you better discuss them as everyone does here at wiki. To clean your spams is an extra burden for us in keeping wiki clean and correct. Please cooperate. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC) Malin, as you have no idea about the issues you post on, as proven again and again, the boxes will be replaced as fast as you remove them. Your personal vendetta against anyone attempting to edit these pages certainly merit them being there.

Arbitration
Please follow the steps in the dispute resolution process before attempting to file an arbitration case. I had removed your edits from there. Best.  Syn  ergy 21:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Arbcom
Hi -- Arbcom is the last step in dispute resolution, only to be used if all else fails. For the dispute you are having, the next step is probably to make a concrete proposal on the talk page of the article in question, and see whether other editors support it. If that breaks down, the next step is to try an RFC. If that doesn't lead to improvement, you go to ANI. Only if you find yourself having problems over and over again should you go to Arbcom for help. Looie496 (talk) 21:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

ARBCOM
Dear all, This dispute has been ongoing for at least three years. As regards a concrete proposal, I refer to the talk page of the main article. As usual, Wikipedias main problem lies with users with an axe to grind.
 * To what dispute and to which article are you referring? — Travis talk  22:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

ooops, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Military_ranks_of_the_Swedish_armed_forces Currently it's in pretty good shape, but that tends to only last a little while. Hans Engstrom (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. I see many fractured discussions there, but no concrete effort to gain a consensus. The dispute resolution page provides a great deal of information on how to resolve your issues. Cheers — Travis talk  22:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gsmgm (talk) 09:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. At Military ranks of the Swedish armed forces, reported at. EdJohnston (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The other party was not blocked for WP:3RR because she did not make four reverts in 24 hours, as Hans did. If you want to be unblocked, it would be more sensible to offer a plan for peacefully resolving the dispute once you return to editing. EdJohnston (talk) 15:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Credit
Haj Hans, Jag ville bara ge dig uppmuntran för att du orkar! (jag gissar du förstår vad jag menar?) Ghostrider (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Mange takk! Hans Engstrom (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)