User talk:Hans Lucas

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. Xiner (talk, email) 17:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hello again
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 17:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Your edits on The Dixie Chicks
Hi. Please don't make big reversions/edits minor, such as you did here. It could be interpreted as edit warring or vandalism. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 16:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Kyle Sandilands
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kyle Sandilands appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. - Bilby (talk) 08:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. It sure did. It did, nevertheless, reflect factual information on the public record. Would it have been okay if I had correctly referenced Mr Sandilands' statement?