User talk:Hans Unterf376

Josh Beames
Congratulations, Josh Beames is now an article.

As you'll see, I removed File:Calendar_-_2020.jpg from it. Presumably the copyright holder is Beames or his publisher. But you say that it's your "own work" and that you are "the copyright holder of this work". So: Are you Beames, or his publisher? Or has there been some misunderstanding somewhere? -- Hoary (talk) 09:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi there. I'm not Josh Beames. My husband had purchased the product and I took a photo of it. If I've misunderstood how this works, I apologise and thank you for removing it. I had seen other wiki pages with photos of artworks - eg images of public sculptures - and figured the same rule would apply. HannahNimmo (talk) 04:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)


 * It's an understandable mistake, and one that's commonly made. (As for the matter of images in -- or visible from -- public spaces, it's one of the "freedom [or not] of panorama". Let's not venture there right now....) As far as Wikipedia is concerned, the copyright of a straightforward photograph by person A of something that's copyrighted by person B itself belongs to person B. What I suggest that you do is go to your photo's page on Wikimedia Commons and (of course while you're logged in there) mark it with something like . (Of course, feel free to rephrase what comes after "speedydelete|" to your own taste.)


 * NB although we normally take a biographee's word for date of birth, which university they graduated from, etc -- I mean, unless such assertions are questioned by reasonable people -- we avoid taking their word for achievements. Thus we don't take a biographee's word for the names of clients worked for, awards won, exhibitions held, and the like. It's not that we think they're liars, it's just our responsibility to be sceptical. That's why I removed the reference citing a page on JB's website for his clients list. (I ignored the podcast. If that's of him talking, then that link too should be removed.)


 * Well, sorry for the perhaps sour-sounding notes above, but I hope to get the bad news out of the way at the start, so you'll have smooth sailing ahead. All the best filling out the article here and there as you gather more information, and of course working on (creating?) other articles. -- Hoary (talk) 05:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ATEBIT


The article ATEBIT has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unremarkable podcasting company with no apparent significant coverage. The claim of its 'range of high-rated and critically acclaimed shows' cites a webpage from PAX Australia which doesn't seem to mention the claim. The claim that ATEBIT is 'the first podcast network to host a panel at PAX Australia' is also sourced to PAX's website and doesn't help the podcasting company stand out from other Australian ones."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aranya (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The citations have been updated to include references from media outlets including Sydney's City Hub and MCV's Trade Media. Agree with the critique of previous references, they were incomplete and misleading. Have reworded the PAX panel statement to more appropriately reflect the citations without added uncited commentary. Hans Unterf376 (talk) 04:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ATEBIT


A tag has been placed on ATEBIT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Josh Beames for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Beames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Josh Beames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Re: the profile image, I would suggest someone attending a photography workshop would be capable of taking a photo like the one uploaded here.

Regarding the news articles, some of those referenced are among the most trusted and popular news media outlets in Australia (Herald Sun, Fairfax Regional News etc). If there’s an issue with using photography websites that are profiling artists, I would prefer to see those queried or removed rather than the entire Wiki page. Hans Unterf376 (talk) 03:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Trigger Witch cover art (Japanese version).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trigger Witch cover art (Japanese version).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Hans Unterf376. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, if I ever have conflict of interest I will keep this in mind Hans Unterf376 (talk) 14:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That's a very disingenuous reply. Then she goes on to continue to edit in areas where she has a clear conflict of interest. Want me to go into detail? duffbeerforme (talk) 13:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trigger Witch cover art (Japanese version).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trigger Witch cover art (Japanese version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Josh Beames for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Beames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Josh Beames (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rainbite for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rainbite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rainbite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)